Keywords
avoidance
well-being
How to Cite
Abstract
Self-compassion is measured with a self-report Likert-type scale and has been shown to be useful in promoting positive psychological functioning in many scientific areas, from social psychology to psychopathology. However, while most of these studies used the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) to measure self-compassion in correlational designs, there are many criticisms concerning the psychometric properties of the SCS. The claim of this study is that the current SCS is insufficient in capturing the full scope of the concept self-compassion. Therefore, this study proposes that an avoidance dimension is added to SCS. The aim of this work is to (i) discuss the limits of the current SCS, (ii) propose additional items to measure avoidance behavior, and (iii) test the reliability and validity of the revised SCS. As expected, the newly generated avoidance items were valid in measuring avoidance behaviors. The revised SCS passed the reliability and validity tests and explained a greater amount of variance in well-being than the current SCS. The most important limits of the study are the construction of the items and the uneven distribution of females/males in the participant pool. The limits of the study and suggestions for further research are discussed.
ERRATUM (14/04/2026): In the originally published version of this article, the ethics committee approval information and informed consent statement were inadvertently omitted from the article text. This study was conducted under the approval of the Middle East Technical University Human Research Ethics Committee (Date: January 21, 2020; Protocol No: 487-ODTÜ-2019). Additionally, the typographical error "Middkle" in the Author Note has been corrected to "Middle." The updated PDF is available above. This correction does not affect the ethical compliance or scientific findings of the study.
References
Akca, E. (2014). Personality and cultural predictors of the Quiet Ego: Comparing Turkey and the United States (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Social Sciences Institutition, Ankara, Turkey.
Akın, Ü., Akın, A., & Abacı, R. (2007). SCS: The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 1-10.
Altın, M., & Gençöz, T. (2009). Psychopathological correlates and psychometric properties of the White Bear Suppression Inventory in a Turkish sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 23-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.23
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107319110528350
Barnard, L. K. & Curry, J. F. (2011). Self-compassion: Conceptualizations, correlates and interventions. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 289-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025754
Barton, J. M. (2016). Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the SCS: Using Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Models. UNF Theses and Dissertations. 637. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/637
Brenner, R. E., Heath, P. J., Vogel, D. L., & Crede, M. (2017). Two is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the SCS (SCS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 696-707.
Brown, K. W. & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Evaluating the multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the SCS in clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 856-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22187
Cleare, S., Gumley, A., Cleare, C. J., & O’Conner, R. C. (2018). An investigation of the factor structure of the SCS. Mindfulness, 9, 618-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0803-1
Coroiu, A., Kwakkenbos, L., Moran, C., Thombs, B., Albani, C., Bourkas,….Körner, A. (2018). Structural validation of the SCS with a German general population sample. Plos One, 13(2), https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0190771
Costa, J., Maroco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferraria, C., & Castilho, P. (2016). Validation of the psychometric properties of the SCS. Testing the factorial validity of the measure among borderline personality, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 23, 460-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1974
Cunha, M., Xavier, A., Castilho, P. (2015). Understanding self-compassion in adolescents: Validation study of the SCS. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.023
Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adolesanlarda benlik saygısı (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Deniz, M. E., Kesici, Ş., & Sümer, S. (2008). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the SCS. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(9), 1151-1160.
Diedenhofen, B. & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(4): e0121945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI); Administration, scoring and procedures manual- II. Clinical Psychometric Research Inc.
Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99, 413-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4
Garcia-Campayo, J., Navarro-Gil, M., Andres, E., Montero-Marin, J., Lopez-Artal, L., & Demarzo, M. M. P. (2014). Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the SCS (SCS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-4
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. (pp. 89-149). Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
Kısa, G. (2021). Does Self-Compassion Involve Non-Avoidance? Testing a Revised Self-Compassion Scale [Ph.D. - Doctoral Program]. Middle East Technical University.
Lopez, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., Sonderen, E. V., Rnachor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015). A reconsideration of the SCS’s total score: Self-compassion versus self-criticism. Plos One, 10(7), http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0132940
Mantzios, M., Wilson, J. C., & Giannou, K. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Self- Compassion and Mindful Attention and Awareness scales. Mindfulness, 6, 123-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0237-3
Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection as the mirror image of psychopathology: Further critical notes on the SCS. Mindfulness, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0509-9
Neff, K. (2003a). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298860390129863
Neff, K.D. (2003b). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
Neff, K. D. (2016a). The SCS is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7, 264-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3
Neff, K. D. (2016b). Does self-compassion entail reduced self-judgement, isolation and over-identification? A response to Muris, Otgaar, Petrocchi, 2016. Mindfulness, 7, 791-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0531-y
Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, Achievement Goals, and Coping with Academic Failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317
Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., Rude, S. S., (2007a). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.00
Neff, K. D., Rude, S. S., & Kirkpatrick, K. L., (2007b). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 908- 916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.002
Neff, K. D., Whittaker, T. A., & Karl, A. (2017). Examining the factor structure of the SCS in four distinct populations: Is the use of a total scale score justified? Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(6), 596- 607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1269334
Petrocchi, N., Ottaviani, C., & Couyoumdjian, A. (2014). Dimensionality of self-compassion: Translation of the SCS in an Italian sample. Journal of Mental Health, 23(2), 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2013.84186
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Şahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). Kısa Semptom Envanteri (Brief Symptom Inventory-BSI): Türk gençleri için uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44-56.
Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62(4), 615-640.
Zeng, X., Wei, J., Oei, T. P., & Liu, X. (2016). The SCS is not validated in a Buddhist sample. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(6), 1996-2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0205-z
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi