The Positive and Negative Ex-Relationship Thoughts (PANERT) Scale: Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study
Cilt 12 Sayı 32 kapak
PDF (Turkish)

Keywords

Ex-relationship
positive thoughts
negative thoughts
adaptation

How to Cite

The Positive and Negative Ex-Relationship Thoughts (PANERT) Scale: Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study. (2024). Nesne Journal of Psychology, 12(32), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-12-32-04

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the "The Positive and Negative Ex-Relationship Thoughts (PANERT) Scale” developed by Brenner and Vogel (2015) into Turkish culture and to conduct its validity and reliability studies. The research was conducted with a total of 367 participants, including 194 women (%53) and 173 men (%47), attending various departments of Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Education. Firstly, the language validity of the scale was examined. Afterwards, the three-factor structure of the scale was examined with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). According to the confirmatory factor analysis results, the chi-square value (χ2/sd=, p<.05) found for the two-dimensional structure of the scale; NFI (.96), CFI (.97), IFI (.97), GFI (..93) values indicate that the model has a good fit. These results showed that the two-factor structure of the PANERT scale was confirmed. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the two-factor structure of the PANERT Scale-Turkish Form was confirmed. To determine the concurrent validity of the scale, the "Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale", "Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale", and the "Rumination" subscale of the "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire" were used as criteria. The reliability of the scale was calculated using the test-retest reliability coefficient and internal consistency coefficient. The Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.92 (p <.05) for the positive thoughts subscale and .91 (p <.05) for the negative thoughts subscale. Consequently, all findings suggest that “PANERT Scale-Turkish Form” is a valid and reliable measurement tool for emerging adults.

PDF (Turkish)

References

Arnett, J. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for?. Child development perspectives, 1(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x

Brenner, R. E. (2015). Adjustment to the dissolution of a romantic relationship: effects of ex-relationship specific thought content valence (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University).

Brenner, R. E. ve Vogel, D. L. (2015). Measuring thought content valence after a breakup: Development of the Positive and Negative Ex-Relationship Thoughts (PANERT) scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(3), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000073

Bullock, M., Hackathorn, J., Clark, E. M. ve Mattingly, B. A. (2011). Can we be (and stay) friends? Remaining friends after dissolution of a romantic relationship. The Journal of social psychology, 151(5), 662-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.522624

Busboom, A. L., Collins, D. M., Givertz, M. D. ve Levin, L. A. (2002). Can we still be friends? Resources and barriers to friendship quality after romantic relationship dissolution. Personal Relationships, 9(2), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00014

Cohen, R. J. ve Swerdlik, M. E. (2002). Psychological testing and assessment. McGraw-Hill.

Collibee, C. ve Furman, W. (2015). Quality counts: Developmental shifts in associations between romantic relationship qualities and psychosocial adjustment. Child Development, 86(5), 1639-1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12403

Cupach, W. R., Spitzberg, B. H., Bolingbroke, C. M. ve Tellitocci, B. S. (2011). Persistence of attempts to reconcile a terminated romantic relationship: A partial test of relational goal pursuit theory. Communication Reports, 24(2), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2011.613737

Dailey, R. M., Jin, B., Pfiester, A. ve Beck, G. (2011). On-again/off-again dating relationships: What keeps partners coming back?. The Journal of social psychology, 151(4), 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.503249

Dailey, R. M., Zhong, L., Varga, S., Zhang, Z. ve Kearns, K. (2024). Explicating a comprehensive model of post-dissolution distress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(4), 1018-1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231207588

del Palacio-Gonzalez, A., Clark, D. A. ve O’Sullivan, L. F. (2017). Distress severity following a romantic breakup is associated with positive relationship memories among emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817704117

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O. ve Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44, 705–727. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2010.13023

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O. ve Delgado, J. (2010). Breakup distress and loss of intimacy in university students. Psychology, 01(03), 173– 177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2010.13023

Fisher, B. F. (1976). Identifying and meeting needs of formerly-married people through a divorce adjustment seminar. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Northern, Colorado.

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V. ve Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual differences, 30(8), 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6

Griffith, R. L., Gillath, O., Zhao, X. ve Martinez, R. (2017). Staying friends with ex‐romantic partners: Predictors, reasons, and outcomes. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 550-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12197

Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B. ve Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer mindfulness/mindlessness scale. Assessment, 18(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110386342

Hendrickson, N. R. ve Štětinová, K. (2016). The Relationship between Emotional Well-being and a Lack of Closure with Ex-partners. Undergraduate Psychology Research Methods Journal, 1(18), 9.

Henry, J. D. ve Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British journal of clinical psychology, 44(2), 227-239. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1348/014466505X29657

Joseph, S., Williams, R. ve Yule, W. (1995). Psychosocial perspectives on post-traumatic stress. Clinical Psychology Review, 15(6), 515–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(95)00029-O

Langeslag, S. J. ve Sanchez, M. E. (2018). Down-regulation of love feelings after a romantic break-up: Self- report and electrophysiological data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 720. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xge0000360

Lee, B. H. ve O'Sullivan, L. F. (2014). The ex-factor: Characteristics of online and offline post-relationship contact and tracking among Canadian emerging adults. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2415

Meier, A. ve Allen, G. (2008). Intimate relationship development during the transition to adulthood: Differences by social class. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 25– 39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.207

Moller, N. P., Fouladi, R. T., McCarthy, C. J. ve Hatch, K. D. (2003). Relationship of attachment and social support to college students' adjustment following a relationship breakup. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81(3), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00262.x

Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Paulhus, D. L. ve Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, 1(2007), 224-239.

Rollie, S. S. ve Duck, S. (2006). Divorce and dissolution of romantic relationships: Stage models and their limitations. In Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 239-256). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315820880-21

Rubenstein, C. ve Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy, 206-223.

Schneider, K. A. (2021). Social Cognitive Processing Theory of Romantic Relationship Dissolution (Doctoral dissertation, Baylor University).

Smyth, A. P., Peetz, J. ve Capaldi, A. A. (2020). Ex-appraisal bias: Negative illusions in appraising relationship quality retrospectively. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(5), 1673-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520907150

Spielmann, S. S., Joel, S., MacDonald, G. ve Kogan, A. (2013). Ex appeal: Current relationship quality and emotional attachment to ex-partners. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612448198

Spielmann, S. S., Macdonald, G. ve Wilson, A. E. (2009). On the rebound: Focusing on someone new helps anxiously attached individuals let go of ex-partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1382-1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341580

Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş (Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları). Ankara: Ekinoks.

Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.

Tan, K., Agnew, C. R., VanderDrift, L. E. ve Harvey, S. M. (2015). Committed to us: Predicting relationship closeness following nonmarital romantic relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(4), 456-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514536293

Tashiro, T. Y. ve Frazier, P. (2003). “I’ll never be in a relationship like that again”: Personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Personal relationships, 10(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00039

Tuna, E. ve Bozo, Ö. (2012). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Turkish version. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 34, 564-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9303-8

Van der Watt, A. S., Roos, A., Du Plessis, S., Bui, E., Lesch, E. ve Seedat, S. (2022). An attachment theory approach to reframing romantic relationship breakups in university students: A narrative review of attachment, neural circuitry, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 21(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2021.1908197

Wang, J. ve Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.

Yıldırım, A., Boysan, M. ve Kefeli, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 46(5), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1442558

Yılmaz, A. E. ve Fışıloğlu, H. (2006). Psychometric Properties of the Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale in a Turkish Divorced Sample. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 45(1-2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v45n01_08

Yılmaz, A. E., Akyüz, Z., Bintaş Zörer, P., Erarslan İngeç, Ö., Öksüzler Cabılar, B. ve Tulum Akbulut, S. (2021). Derivation and psychometric evaluation of the Fisher Divorce Adjustment Scale-Short Form in a Turkish sample. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 62(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1833291

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi