ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT: IS WHAT WE LOOK AT OR THE PERSPECTIVE WE LOOK FROM MORE IMPORTANT?
Cilt 9 Sayı 21 kapak
PDF (Turkish)

Keywords

Organizational conflict
qualitative research
business ethics
affect
perspective taking

How to Cite

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT: IS WHAT WE LOOK AT OR THE PERSPECTIVE WE LOOK FROM MORE IMPORTANT? (2021). Nesne Journal of Psychology, 9(21), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-09-21-02

Abstract

This study examined organizational conflict using two alternative research methods. In Study I qualitative data was raised via interviews on workplace conflicts from 40 faculty members and research assistants employed in a public university. In Study II vignettes of conflict scenarios were presented to participants and data were raised from 170 graduate and doctorate students. Vignettes differed in terms of the perspective it assumed; consisting of the subordinate, manager, and the neutral observer perspective. Participants were asked to report their affective reactions (negative and positive), conflict management style (collaborating, compromising, accomodating, avoiding and competing) and ethical evaluations (employee and manager) with regards to the vignettes. Content analysis of interviews revealed that injustice, differences of opinions and miscommunication were among the most frequently reported themes of conflict. Variance analyses were carried out for the vignette study on the above mentioned dependent variables. Main effect of perspective was found for most of the variables, such that subordinate perspective participants experienced higher levels of negative affect in reponse to the conflict; neutral perspective reported higher levels of the use of compromising strategy while subordinate perspective had significantly higher levels of avoiding, accomodating, and competing. In terms of the ethical evaluations of the subordinate and manager characters of the scenarios, each perspective perceived itself as more ethical than the other party. These findings point out the importance of perspective taking and empathy in organizational conflict. Practical implications for conflict resolution are discussed in light of the study findings.

PDF (Turkish)

References

Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600201

Bies, R. J. ve Tripp, T. M. (1996) Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. In RM Kramer and TR Tyler (eds) Trust in organizations, 246–260. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Brewer, N., Mitchell, P. ve Weber, N. (2002). Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles. Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 78–94.

Bruk-Lee, V. ve Spector, P. E. (2006). The social stressors– counterproductive work behaviors link: Are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 145–156.https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.145

Choi, Y. ve Ha, J. (2018). Job satisfaction and work productivity: the role of conflict-management culture. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(7), 1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6940

Çizel, B., Selçuk, O. ve Atabay, E. (2020). Ortak Yöntem Yanlılığı Üzerine Sistematik Bir Yazın Taraması. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31(1), 7 – 18. https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.713552

De Dreu, C. K. W. ve Beersma, B. (2005). Conflict in organizations: Beyond effectiveness and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000227

De Dreu, C. K. W. ve Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L. ve Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360 –390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844

Farwell, L. ve Weiner, B. (1996). Self-perception of fairness in individual and group contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 867–881.

Fujiwara, K., Tsukishima, E., Tsutsumi, A., Kawakami, N. ve Kishi, R. (2003). Interpersonal conflict, social support, and burnout among home care workers in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 45(5):313–20. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.45.313

Geddes, D., Callister, R. R. ve Gibson, D. (2020). A message in the madness: Functions of workplace anger in organizational life. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 8-47.

Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. ve Keller, K. (2008). On the etiology of organizational conflict cultures. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.001

Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15, 27-28.

Greer, L. L. ve Bendersky, C. (2013). Power and Status in Conflict and Negotiation Research: Introduction to the Special Issue. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12021

Holt, L. M., Bobocel, D. R. ve Chen, V. (2021). Delivering bad news fairly: Higher construal level promotes interactional justice enactment through perspective taking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2497

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256 –282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638

Keenan, A. ve Newton, T. J. (1985). Stressful events, stressors, and psychological strains in young professional engineers. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6, 151- 156.

Longmire, N. H. ve Harrison, D. A. (2018). Seeing their side versus feeling their pain: Differential consequences of perspective‐taking and empathy at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 894– 915. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000307

Meier, L. L., Semmer, N. K. ve Gross, S. (2014). The effect of conflict at work on well-being: Depressive symptoms as a vulnerability factor. Work & Stress, 28(1), 31–48.

Mikkelsen, E. N. ve Clegg, S. (2018). Unpacking the meaning of conflict in organizational conflict research. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11, 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12127

Neiderauer, S. (2006). Üniversite üst düzey yöneticilerinin kişilik tipleri ve örgütsel çatışmayı çözme stratejileri (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.

Packard, D. (1995). In K. Lewis & D. Kirby (Eds.),The HP Way: How Bill Hewlett and I built our company. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63: 539-569.

Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.5465/255985

Rahim, M. A. ve Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44, 1323-1344.

Ray, E. B. ve Ray, G.B. (1986.) Teaching conflict management skills in corporate training: a perspective- taking approach, Communication Education, 35, pp. 288-290.

Reidenbach, R. E. ve Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 639-653.

Richardson, D. R., Hammock, G. S., Smith, S. M., Gardner, W. ve Signo, M. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 275-289.

Schein, E. H. (2003). DEC is dead, long live DEC: The lasting legacy of digital equipment corporation. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler PublishersInc.

Sessa, V. I. (1996). Using perspective taking to manage conflict and affect in teams. Journal of Applied Be- havioral Science, 32: 101-115.

Spector, P. E. ve Bruke - Lee, V. (2008). Conflict, health and well-being. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Spector, P. E. ve Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356– 367.

Sporn, B. (1996). Managing university culture: an analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches, Higher Education, 32, 41-61.

Thomas, K. W. ve Schmidt, W. H. (1976). A survey of managerial interests with respect to conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 315-318. https://doi.org/10.5465/255781

Veroff, J., Douvan, E. ve Kulka, R. A. (1981). The inner America. New York: Basic Books.

Wall, J. A. ve Callister, R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 3: 515-558.

Wallace, J. E. ve Buchanan, T. (2019). Status differences in interpersonal strain and job resources at work: a mixed methods study of animal health care providers. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31, 287–308. DOI: 10.1108/IJCMA-08-2019-0135

Watson, D., Clarke, L. A. ve Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063- 1070.

Watson, C. (1994). Gender Differences in Negotiating Behavior and Outcomes: Fact or Artifact?, in A. Taylor and J. Beinstein-Miller (eds.), Conflict and Gender (Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskill, NJ), pp. 191-210.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi