Keywords
figure-ground
Prägnanz & dynamic memory traces
Kurt Koffka
Hedwig von Restorff
Erich Goldmeier
How to Cite
Abstract
This article is a sequel to “Gestalt Theory: Its Past, its Stranding, and its Future..”. It focuses on what Gestalt theory proposed and produced within the area of memory, which unfortunately are almost unknown. It is typically believed that Gestalt theory is a theory about perception only. This, however, is not true. The aim of this article is to bring to daylight the conceptual and empirical contributions of Gestalt theory within the field of memory. The first part of the article discusses some critical proposals about memory processes in Kurt Koffka’s Principles of Gestalt (1936) book. These involve Koffka’s proposal about the involvement and effects of memory processes in the perception of successive Gestalts; a discussion of the similarities and differences between percepts and memory traces; Koffka’s reference to research suggesting that memory traces are dynamic such that depending on their Prägnanz they will or will not change during storage; that the type of change can even be predicted in some cases. The article will then review one of the most powerful empirical studies on memory within a Gestalt framework, i. e., Hedwig von Restorff’s 1933 dissertation demonstrating how figure-ground effects are at play not only in perception but also in memory. In the final part of this article, I will present Erich Goldmeier’s very original and interesting memory work, which seemed utterly ignored by mainstream cognitive psychology.
References
Bartlett, F. C. (1932/1977). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.
Blesser, B., Shillman, R., Cox, C., Kuklinski, T., Ventura, J. ve Eden, M. (1973). Character recognition based on phenomenological attributes. Visible Language, 7(3), 209-223. DOI: 10.1016/S0020- 7373(74)80033-7
Bower, G. H. ve Winzenz, D. (1969). Group structure, coding, and memory for digit series. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(2, Pt.2), 1-17. DOI: 10.1037/h0027249
Bregman, A. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT press.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Buhusi, C. V. (2020). Episodic time in the brain: A new world order. Learning & Behavior, 189-190. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-019-00379-4
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P. ve Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15(1), 73-86.
Chan, J. C. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 153-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.004
Cohn, N. ve Magliano, J. P. (2020). Editors’ Introduction and Review: Visual Narrative Research: An Emerging Field in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 197-223. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12473
Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
Goldmeier, E. (1982). The Memory Trace: Its Formation and its Fate. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Goodwin, C. J. (2005). A History of Modern Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hashtroudi, S., Ferguson, S. A., Rappold, V. A. ve Chrosniak, L. D. (1988). Data-driven and conceptually driven processes in partial-word identification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 749-757. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.4.749
Hochberg, J. (2003). Acts of perceptual inquiry: Problems for any stimulus-based simplicity theory. Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 215-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.002
Kanizsa, G. (1976). Subjective contours. Scientific American, 234(4), 48-53.
Koffka, K. (1936). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Kegan Paul.
Köhler, W. (1938). The Place of Value in a World of Facts. New York: Liveright.
Köhler, W. (1950). Psychology and evolution. Acta Psychologica, 7, 288–297. DOI: 10.1016/0001- 6918(50)90020-5
Kunst-Wilson, W. R. ve Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207(4430), 557-558. DOI: 10.1126/science.7352271
MacLeod, C. M. (2020). Zeigarnik and von Restorff: The memory effects and the stories behind them. Memory & Cognition, 48, 1073–1088. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01033-5
McCloskey, M. ve Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.114.1.1
Mungan, E. (2020). Geştalt Kuramı: Bir “Nazariye” nin mazisi, akameti ve akıbeti. Nesne, 8(18), 585-618.
Mungan, E. ve Kaya, E. (2020). Some Time Violations Go Less Noticed: Gestalt Grouping? A Brief Report. Timing & Time Perception, 1(aop), 1-13. DOI: 10.1163/22134468-bja10010
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. New York: Freeman
Nickerson, R. S. ve Adams, M. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 287-307. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90013-6
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT press.
Restle, F. (1970). Theory of serial pattern learning: Structural trees. Psychological Review, 77(6), 481– 495. DOI: 10.1037/h0029964
Rock, I. (1984). Perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Roediger, H. L. (1978). Recall as a self-limiting process. Memory & Cognition, 6(1), 54–63. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197428
Roediger, H. L. (1980). Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 231-246. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197611
Roediger, H. L. ve McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803-814. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(1), 156-163. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80067-7
Tolman, E. C. ve Honzik, C. H. (1930). Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats. University of California publications in psychology, 4(17), 257-275.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208. DOI: 10.1037/h0061626
Tversky, A. ve Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110. DOI: 10.1037/h0031322
Ünal, G. ve Ayhan, İ. (2020). İşlevsel Özelleşmeye yeni bir bakış: Nöronal saatler. Nesne, 8(17), 270-283.
Von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung, 18(1), 299-342.
Warrington, E. K. ve Weiskrantz, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217(5132), 972-974. DOI: 10.1038/217972a0
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychologische Forschung, 4(1), 301-350.
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
Wiseman, S. ve Neisser, U. (1974). Perceptual organization as a determinant of visual recognition memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 87(4), 675-681. DOI: 10.2307/1421974
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 37-40. DOI: 10.1037/h0025848
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi