Adaptation Study of Relationship Social Comparison Scale
Cilt 9 Sayı 19 kapak
PDF

Keywords

Relationship social comparison
perceived relationship quality
adaptation of relationship social comparison measure (RSCM)
reliability
convergent validity

How to Cite

Gürsoy, B. E., & Öner Özkan, B. (2021). Adaptation Study of Relationship Social Comparison Scale. Nesne Journal of Psychology, 9(19), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-09-19-03

Article History

Received: 10 August 2020
Revised: 18 January 2021
Accepted: 18 February 2021
Published: 15 April 2021

Abstract

Current study was aimed to translate Relationship Social Comparison Measure (RSCM) into Turkish and test psychometric properties of the Turkish version. RSCM was originally developed as a one factor scale by LeBeau and Buckingham (2008) in order to assess the frequency of relationship social comparison and circumstances under which comparison occur. However, principal component factor analyses suggested two factor solutions, namely General Tendency (α= .94) and Partner Attributions (α= .86), showing the presence of two constructs tapping different aspects of relationship social comparison. Suggested factor structure of RSCM was also tested with a confirmatory factor analysis, and results supported the two-factor solution (S-B χ 2 (167) = 275.13, p = .00, S-B χ2/df = 1.65, CFI = .95, RMSEA = .05, 90% CI [.04, .06]). The Turkish version of RSCM has high internal reliability as its original form (α= .94). Moreover, the results strongly supported convergent validity with relationship satisfaction, investment, and quality of alternatives. Adaptation of RSCM in Turkish will provide an important tool for studies related to RSC in Turkey with strong psychometric properties. By doing so, it was expected to make scientific contributions to the studies related to romantic relationships in Turkey.

Öz

Bu çalışmada İlişki Sosyal Kıyas Ölçeğinin (İSKÖ) Türkçe ’ye çevrilmesi ve Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özelliklerinin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. İSKÖ, ilişkilerin sosyal karşılaştırma sıklığını ve karşılaştırmanın gerçekleştiği koşulları değerlendirmek için LeBeau ve Buckingham (2008) tarafından tek faktörlü bir yapıda geliştirilmiştir. Ancak, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, sosyal karşılaştırma kavramının farklı yönlerine değinen iki farklı soru kümesinin olduğunu ve Genel Karşılaştırma Eğilimi (α = .94) ve Partnere Yapılan Atıf (α = .86) olmak üzere iki faktörlü çözümün örneklem için uygun olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Önerilen faktör yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile de test edilmiştir ve sonuçlar iki faktörlü çözümü desteklemektedir (S-B χ 2 (167) = 275.13, p = .00, S-B χ2/df = 1.65, CFI = .95, RMSEA = .05, %90 CI [.04, .06]). Ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonu orijinal hali gibi yüksek iç tutarlılık katsayısına sahiptir (α = .94). Ayrıca, bulgular Türkçe versiyonun yetişkin bağlanma stili, ilişki tatmini, ilişki yatırımı ve seçeneklerin niteliğinin değerlendirilmesi ile güçlü birleşen geçerliliğine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. İSKÖ' nün Türkçe ’ye uyarlanması, Türkiye'de romantik ilişkiler ve sosyal karşılaştırmalar ile ilgili akademik yapılacak çalışmalar için güçlü psikometrik özellikleri olan bir araç bir araç sağlayacaktır. Böylelikle Türkiye’de romantik ilişkiler ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalara önemli bilimsel katkılar sağlanması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: İlişkide sosyal karşılaştırma, algılanan ilişki kalitesi, ilişkide sosyal karşılaştırma ölçeğinin (ISKÖ) adaptasyonu, güvenirlik, ayırt edici geçerlik

PDF

References

Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. In Los Angeles: BMDP Statistic Software.

Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2013). EXCEL macro file for conducting scaled difference chi-square tests via LISREL 8, LISREL 9, EQS, and Mplus. Available from the authors

Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2003). What You Think Is What You Get: Comparative Evaluations of Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256918

Buunk, B. M. P., Vanyperen, N. W., Taylor, S. E., & Collins, R. L. (1991). Social comparison and the drive upward revisited: Affiliation as a response to marital stress. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210607

Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The Affective Consequences of Social Comparison: Either Direction Has Its Ups and Downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1238

Buunk, B. P., & Van Der Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (1997). Perceived prevalence, perceived superiority, and relationship satisfaction: Most relationships are good, but ours is the best. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233001

Buunk, B. P., & Van Yperen, N. W. (1991). Referential Comparisons, Relational Comparisons, and Exchange Orientation: Their Relation to Marital Satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291176015

Büyükşahin, A., Hasta, D., & Hovardaoğlu, S. (2005). İlişki istikrarı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8(16), 25–35.

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, second edition. In Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203726532

Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

IBM, Corporation, I. B. M., SPSS, IBM, Statistics, I. B. M. S., IBM, Statistics, I. B. M. S., IBM, SPSS/IBM, IBM Corp., IBM, Statistics, I. B. M. S., IBM, Germany, T., Statistics, I. B. M. S., IBM, Statistics, I. B. M. S., IBM, SPSS/IBM, … SPSS/IBM. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Release Notes. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331889108802322

LeBeau, L. S., & Buckingham, J. T. (2008). Relationship social comparison tendencies, insecurity, and perceived relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507086806

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling better about doing worse: Social comparisons within romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 80– 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.80

Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A. (2011). The Salience of Adolescent Romantic Experiences for Romantic Relationship Qualities in Young Adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(4), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00737.x

Morry, M. M., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2016). Relationship social comparison interpretations and dating relationship quality, behaviors, and mood. Personal Relationships, 23(3), 554–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12143

Morry, M. M., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2019). Relationship social comparisons in dating and marital relationships: Adding relationship social comparison interpretations. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1498826

Morry, M. M., Sucharyna, T. A., & Petty, S. K. (2018). Relationship social comparisons: Your facebook page affects my relationship and personal well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 140–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.038

Moss, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining Intimacy in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations. https://doi.org/10.2307/584918

Mussweiler, T. (2001). “Seek and ye shall find”: Antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.75

Okutan, N., & Büyükşahin-Sunal, A. (2010). Romantik ilişkilerde bağlanım: Dindarlık algısı ve romantik ilişkilerle ilgili kalıpyargılar. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x

Rusbult, C. E., Van Lange, P. A. M., Wildschut, T., Yovetich, N. A., & Verette, J. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.521

Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, N., Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları.

Suls, Jerry; Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of Social Comparison.

Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00191

Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. (2006). Social Psychology (12th ed.), (pp. 132-168.) Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Thai, S., Lockwood, P., Pinkus, R. T., & Chen, S. Y. (2015). Being better than you is better for us: Attachment avoidance and social comparisons within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515578826

Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). My Relationship is Better than- and Not as Bad as--Yours is: The Perception of Superiority in Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211005

Vanyperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1991). Sex-Role Attitudes, Social Comparison, and Satisfaction with Relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786934

Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.806

Wesner, K. (2008). Social comparison of romantic relationships: The influence of family, friends, and media. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DdGgaAU55TkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Social+comp arison+of+romantic+relationships+:+The+influence+of+family+,+friends+,+and+media+by&ots=Exp OHE3Anb&sig=JpabdXhmoQ9LF25IMqv4YxcXfl8

Wheeler, L. (1966). Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90062-X

White, G. A. (2011). Implications of relationship social comparison tendencies among dating and married individuals. Dissertation Abstracts International, B: Sciences and Engineering.

Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi