TESTING A METACOGNITIVE REGULATION APPROACH FOR JUDGMENT OF SATIATION: MIGHT HUNGER AND FULLNESS NOT BE THE POLAR OPPOSITES OF THE SAME DIMENSION?
Cilt 8 Sayı 18 kapak
PDF

Keywords

Metacognition
eating
dietary control
satiation
hunger
fullness

How to Cite

TESTING A METACOGNITIVE REGULATION APPROACH FOR JUDGMENT OF SATIATION: MIGHT HUNGER AND FULLNESS NOT BE THE POLAR OPPOSITES OF THE SAME DIMENSION? (2020). Nesne Journal of Psychology, 8(18), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-08-18-01

Abstract

Despite the existence of several cognitive influences, metacognitive factors on eating and satiation still remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated a relatively recent metacognitive regulation approach and its measurement method in a lab-experiment. Participants (N=216) were shown photografs of varying portions of common lunch foods (selected after a separate study, N=94) and asked to make predicted judgments of satiation (JOS) for each via considering their actual hunger levels and whilst imagining other bodily states (e.g., extremely hungry and completely full). Differences calculated between observed-JOS and their reference scores -those presumed to yield accurate matches for the cases- produced either deviances or none at all (discordant- or concordant-JOS). Hungry-group yielded significantly lower concordant-JOS percentage than full-group regardless of portion size, indicating a clearer cognitive tendency to lose control over consumption when being hungry than satiated. Critically, full-group could not imagine extreme hunger as hungry-group whereas hungry-group imagined complete fullness just as full-group did, suggesting that whilst hunger was not an obstacle to imagine fullness, fullness hindered the ability to imagine hunger. These findings suggest that hunger and fullness might not be the polar opposites on the very same dimension, which would, for instance, reveal a need to revisit the treatments of eating disorders accordingly.

PDF

References

Brunstrom, J. M., Brown, S., Hinton, E. C., Rogers, P. J., & Fay, S. H. (2011). ‘Expected satiety’ changes hunger and fullness in the inter-meal interval. Appetite, 56(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.002

Brunstrom, J. M., Shakeshaft, N. G., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2008). Measuring “expected satiety” in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite, 51(3), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.017

Galak, J., Redden, J. P., Yang, Y., & Kyung, E. J. (2014). How perceptions of temporal distance influence satiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.008

Green, S. M., & Blundell, J. E. (1996). Subjective and objective indices of the satiating effect of foods. Can people predict how filling a food will be? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 50(12), 798–806.

Guzel, M. A. (2015). A metacognitive regulation approach for judgment of satiation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(8), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1057148

Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1984). A boundary model for the regulation of eating. Research Publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19831201-03

Higgs, S. (2005). Memory and its role in appetite regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 85(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.04.003

Higgs, Suzanne. (2008). Cognitive influences on food intake: The effects of manipulating memory for recent eating. Physiology & Behavior, 94(5), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.012

Higgs, Suzanne, & Woodward, M. (2009). Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women. Appetite, 52(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.007

Larson, J. S., Redden, J. P., & Elder, R. S. (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.001

Loeber, S., Grosshans, M., Korucuoglu, O., Vollmert, C., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schneider, S., Wiers, R. W., Mann, K., & Kiefer, F. (2012). Impairment of inhibitory control in response to food-associated cues and attentional bias of obese participants and normal-weight controls. International Journal of Obesity, 36(10), 1334–1339. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.184

Loeber, Sabine, Grosshans, M., Herpertz, S., Kiefer, F., & Herpertz, S. C. (2013). Hunger modulates behavioral disinhibition and attention allocation to food-associated cues in normal-weight controls. Appetite, 71, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.008

Morewedge, C. K., Huh, Y. E., & Vosgerau, J. (2010). Thought for food: imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science (New York, N.Y.), 330(6010), 1530–1533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195701

Murray, M., & Vickers, Z. (2009). Consumer views of hunger and fullness. A qualitative approach. Appetite, 53(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.003

Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. (pp. 1–25). The MIT Press.

Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985). Dieting and binging: A causal analysis. American Psychologist, 40(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.2.193

Redden, J. P. (2015). Desire Over Time: The Multi-Faceted Nature of Satiation. In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The Psychology of Desire (pp. 82–103). Guilford Press.

Redden, J. P., & Galak, J. (2013). The subjective sense of feeling satiated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028896

Robinson, E., Aveyard, P., Daley, A., Jolly, K., Lewis, A., Lycett, D., & Higgs, S. (2013). Eating attentively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of food intake memory and awareness on eating. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(4), 728–742. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.045245

Rozin, P., Dow, S., Moscovitch, M., & Rajaram, S. (1998). What Causes Humans to Begin and End a Meal? A Role for Memory for What Has Been Eaten, as Evidenced by a Study of Multiple Meal Eating in Amnesic Patients. Psychological Science, 9(5), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00073

Schachter, S. (1971). Some extraordinary facts about obese humans and rats. American Psychologist, 26(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030817

Seibt, B., Häfner, M., & Deutsch, R. (2007). Prepared to eat: how immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.365

Stirling, L. J., & Yeomans, M. R. (2004). Effect of exposure to a forbidden food on eating in restrained and unrestrained women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10232

Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030849

Veltkamp, M., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2008). On the emergence of deprivation-reducing behaviors: Subliminal priming of behavior representations turns deprivation into motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.08.005

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi