Gelecekteki Sonuçların Dikkate Alınması Ölçeği’nin (CFCS-14) Kültürler Arası Geçerliği: Türk Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Adams, J., & Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: an empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(Pt 1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X299664

Akirmak, U. (2021). The validity and reliability of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Turkish sample. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 40(5), 2327–2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0153-3

Akirmak, U., Tuncer, N., Akdogan, M., & Erkat, O. B. (2019). The associations of basic psychological needs and autonomous-related self with time perspective: The cultural and familial antecedents of balanced time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.008

Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., & Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.006

Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Alex Linley, P., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271181

Brislin, R. W., & Kim, E. S. (2003). Cultural diversity in people's understanding and uses of time. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00140

Camus, G., Berjot, S., & Ernst-Vintila, A. (2014). Validation française de l'échelle de prise en considération des conséquences futures de nos actes (CFC-14). Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27, 35–63.

Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo time perspective in- ventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000076.

Çelik, E., & Turan, M. E. (2016). A study on the psychometric features of the Turkish version of the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS-8) for young adults and the relation between sensation seeking and life satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1(1), 29– 38. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.309959

Chng, S., Chew, H. S. J., & Joireman, J. (2022). When time is of the essence: Development and validation of brief consideration of future (and immediate) consequences scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 186,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111362

Cumming, G. (2008). Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 286-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x

Dağli, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğı̇ nı̇ n Türkçe'ye uyarlanmasi: geçerlı̇ k ve güvenı̇ rlı̇ k çalişmasi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59). https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229

Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202– 207.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D-W., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156

Echeverría, A. V. ásque., Esteves, C., Gomes, C. V. ilare., & Ortuño, V. E. C. (2015). Portuguese validation of the consideration of future consequences scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.5

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.4.3.272

Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, London.

Geers, A. L., Wellman, J. A., Seligman, L. D., Wuyek, L. A., & Neff, L. A. (2010). Dispositional optimism, goals, and engagement in health treatment programs. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9238-z

Halperin, A. C., Smith, S. S., Heiligenstein, E., Brown, D., & Fleming, M. F. (2010). Cigarette smoking and associated health risks among students at five universities. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 12(2), 96– 104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp182

Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, R. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00032-0

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

Jacobsen, T., Huss, M., Fendrich, M., Kruesi, M.J., & Ziegenhain, U. (1997). Children's ability to delay gratification: longitudinal relations to mother-child attachment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158(4), 411-26. doi: 10.1080/00221329709596679.

Joireman, J., Balliet, D., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Schultz, J. (2008). Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC- Immediate and CFC-Future subs-scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 15–21.

Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252

Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362

Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering future consequences: an integrative model. In L. J. Sanna & E. C. Chang (Eds.). Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 82–99). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177664.003.0006

Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403-422.

Kagitcibasi, Ç. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–164.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834ba210207

Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press, New York, NY

Kübel, S. L., & Wittmann, M. (2020). A German validation of four questionnaires crucial to the study of time perception: BPS, CFC-14, SAQ, and MQT. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8477. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228477

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.

McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., & Percy, A. (2015). Further evidence for a bifactor solution for the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Measurement and conceptual implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 219–222. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.022

McKay, M. T., Morgan, G. B., van Exel, N. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Back to "the future": Evidence of a bifactor solution for scores on the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.999338

McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., Percy, A., & Cole, J. C. (2016). Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale-14. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097

Murphy, L., & Dockray, S. (2018). The consideration of future consequences and health behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 12(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1489298

Nigro, G., Cosenza, M., Ciccarelli, M., & Joireman, J. (2016). An Italian translation and validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.014

Percy, A., McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., & Cole, J. C. (2020). Refining the clinical application of the consideration of future consequences scale -14. Current Psychology, 39, 1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9819-5

R Development Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www. R-project.org/.

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.

Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., dela Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420

Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742

Sznitman, S., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2017). Sensation seeking and adolescent alcohol use: Exploring the mediating role of unstructured socializing with peers. Alcohol and Alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 52(3), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agx008

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

The Jamovi Project (2021). jamovi. (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.53

Vásquez, A., Martín, A., & Maiche, A. (2013). Validation of the Spanish version of the consideration of future consequences scale. In M. P. Paixão, J. T. Da Silva, V. Ortuño, & P. Cordeiro (Eds.). International Studies in Time Perspective (pp. 241-245). University of Coimbra Press.

Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well- being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual- differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271– 1288.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271