Nöropsikolojik Değerlendirmenin Metodolojik Çerçevesi: Amaçlar, Yaklaşımlar ve Uygulama Aşamaları
Cilt 13 Sayı 36 kapak
PDF

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nöropsikoloji
nöropsikolojik değerlendirme
bilişsel-davranışsal profil

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Nöropsikolojik Değerlendirmenin Metodolojik Çerçevesi: Amaçlar, Yaklaşımlar ve Uygulama Aşamaları. (2025). Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 13(36), 208-233. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-13-36-06

Öz

Nöropsikoloji, beyin-davranış ilişkisini inceleyen uygulamalı bir bilim dalıdır. Nöropsikolojik değerlendirme ise, bireyin bilişsel-davranışsal profilini nesnel verilerle ortaya koyan ve özellikle ayırıcı tanıya yardımcı temel bir araçtır. Bu çalışmada, nöropsikolojik değerlendirmenin temel metodolojik çerçevesi doğrultusunda amaçları, yaklaşımları ve uygulama aşamaları incelenmiştir. Nöropsikolojik değerlendirmede dört ana yaklaşım öne çıkmaktadır: Niteliksel vaka analizine dayanan Luria Yaklaşımı, uygulama sürecine odaklı Boston Yaklaşımı, standart testlere dayalı Sabit Batarya Yaklaşımı ve hastanın klinik profiline göre test seçimine vurgu yapan Esnek Batarya Yaklaşımı. Günümüzde bu yaklaşımların birlikte entegre edildiği bütünleştirici bir model benimsenmektedir. Ayrıca, teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte dijital araçlar, telenöropsikoloji ve mobil uygulamalar değerlendirme süreçlerine yeni boyutlar kazandırmaktadır. Nöropsikolojik değerlendirme süreci, detaylı bilgi toplanması, uygun test bataryasının seçilmesi ve uygulanması, elde edilen verilerin klinik bağlamda yorumlanması ve kapsamlı bir raporun hazırlanması olmak üzere dört temel aşamadan oluşmaktadır. Bu sürecin öncelikli amacı, sadece tanıya yardımcı olmak değil, aynı zamanda bireyin bilişsel veya davranışsal olarak güçlü ve zayıf yönlerini belirleyerek bireye özgü rehabilitasyon planlaması yapmak, tedavi sürecinin etkinliğini izlemek ve bireyin günlük yaşam işlevselliğini artırmaya yönelik pratik öneriler sunmaktır. Sonuç olarak, nöropsikolojik değerlendirme nörolojik, psikiyatrik ve gelişimsel bozukluklar için bilişsel-davranışsal profillerin çıkarılmasında ve hasta odaklı tedavi stratejileri geliştirilmesinde önemli bir role sahiptir.

PDF

Referanslar

Andrewes, D. (2016). Neuropsychology: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Ardila A. (1992). Luria's approach to neuropsychological assessment. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 66(1-2), 35–43. doi: 10.3109/00207459208999787

Axelrod, B. N. (2000). Neuropsychological report writing. In Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment (2nd Edition). Psychology Press.

Aycicegi-Dinn, A., Dervent-Ozbek, S., Yazgan, Y. Bicer, D. ve Dinn, W. D. (2011). Neurocognitive correlates of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a Turkish sample. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 3(1), 41–52. doi: 10.1007/s12402-010-0050-y

Baddeley A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Barr, W. B. (2017). Historical trends in neuropsychological assessment. In T. G. Featherstone, M. R. Johnson ve J. L. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–11). Taylor ve Francis.

Bauer, R. M. (1994). The flexible battery approach to neuropsychological assessment. In R. D. Vanderploeg (Ed.), Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment (pp. 259–290). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bennett T. L. (2001). Neuropsychological evaluation in rehabilitation planning and evaluation of functional skills. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 16(3), 237–253.

Benton, A. L. (1977). Psychological testing. In A. B. Baker ve L. H. Baker (Eds.), Clinical neurology. Harper ve Row.

Benton, A. L. (1994). Neuropsychological assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 1.

Bigler E. D. (2007). A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology: challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 22(1), 45– 51. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.019

Brearly, T. W., Shura, R. D., Martindale, S. L., Lazowski, R. A., Luxton, D. D., Shenal, B. V. ve Rowland, J. A. (2017). Neuropsychological test administration by videoconference: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 27(2), 174–186. doi: 10.1007/s11065-017-9349-1

Casaletto, K. B. ve Heaton, R. K. (2017). Neuropsychological Assessment: Past and Future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 23(9-10), 778–790. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001060

Chapman, R. M., Mapstone, M., McCrary, J. W., Gardner, M. N., Porsteinsson, A., Sandoval, T. C., Guillily, M. D., Degrush, E. ve Reilly, L. A. (2011). Predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease using neuropsychological tests and multivariate methods. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(2), 187–199. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.499356

Chaytor, N. S., Barbosa-Leiker, C., Germine, L. T., Fonseca, L. M., McPherson, S. M. ve Tuttle, K. R. (2020). Construct validity, ecological validity and acceptance of self-administered online neuropsychological assessment in adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(1), 148–164. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1811893

Christensen, A. L. (1996). Alexandr Romanovich Luria (1902-1977): contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 6(4), 279-304. doi: 10.1080/713755511

Christensen, A. L., Goldberg, E. ve Bougakov, D. (Eds.). (2009). Luria's legacy in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.

Christensen, A. L. ve Caetano, C. (1999). Luria's neuropsychological evaluation in the nordic countries. Neuropsychology Review, 9(2), 71–78. doi:10.1023/a:1025655707095

Cinan, S. (2005). Bilişsel Nöropsikoloji: Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar ve Yöntem Sorunu. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8(16), 37-54.

Cubillos, C. ve Rienzo, A. (2023). Digital Cognitive Assessment Tests for Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Mental Health, 10, e47487. doi: 10.2196/47487

Donders J. (2001a). A survey of report writing by neuropsychologists, I: general characteristics and content. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1076/clin.15.2.137.1893

Donders J. (2001b). A survey of report writing by neuropsychologists, II: test data, report format, and document length. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(2), 150–161. doi: 10.1076/clin.15.2.150.1902

Donders, J. ve Strong, C. A. H. (2016). General principles of neuropsychological report preparation. In J. Donders (Ed.), Neuropsychological report writing (pp. 1–29). The Guilford Press.

Draper I. T. (1976). Luria’s neuropsychological investigation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 39(4), 409–410.

Feenstra, H. E., Vermeulen, I. E., Murre, J. M. ve Schagen, S. B. (2017). Online cognition: factors facilitating reliable online neuropsychological test results. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 59–84. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1190405

Giovannetti, T., Lamar, M., Cloud, B. S., Swenson, R., Fein, D., Kaplan, E. ve Libon, D. J. (2001). Different underlying mechanisms for deficits in concept formation in dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 16(6), 547– 560.

Golden, C. J. ve Berg, R. A. (1980). Interpretation of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery by item intercorrelation: The Writing scale. Clinical Neuropsychology, 2(1), 8–12.

Goldstein, G. ve McNeil, M. R. (2013). Clinical neuropsychology: A practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Goodglass, H. (1986). The flexible battery in neuropsychological assessment. In T.Incagnoli, G.Goldstein, ve C.J.Golden (Eds.), Clinical application of neuropsychological test batteries (pp. 121–134). Plenum Press.

Goodglass, H. ve Kaplan, E. (1979). Assessment of cognitive deficit in the brain-injured patient. In Neuropsychology (pp. 3-22). Boston, MA: Springer US.

Grant, I. ve Heaton, R. K. (2015). Ralph M. Reitan: A Founding Father of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 30(8), 760–761. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv077

Harris, C., Tang, Y., Birnbaum, E., Cherian, C., Mendhe, D. ve Chen, M. H. (2024). Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 39(3), 290–304. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae016

Harvey P. D. (2012). Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 91–99. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/pharvey

Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J. ve Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead Reitan Battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. FL: PAR.

Hebben, N. ve Milberg, W. (2009). Essentials of neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hom, J. (2003). Forensic Neuropsychology: Are we there yet? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(8), 827–845. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00076-3

Incagnoli, T. M., Goldstein, G. ve Golden, C. J. (Eds.). (1986). Clinical application of neuropsychological test batteries. Plenum Press.

Irak, M. (2022). Nöropsikoloji. TÜBİTAK Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Ansiklopedisi. Erişim tarihi 17 Kasım 2025, https://ansiklopedi.tubitak.gov.tr/ansiklopedi/noropsikoloji

Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll ve B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice (pp. 127–167). American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10063-004

Kaplan, E. (2002). Serendipity in science: A personal account. In A. Y. Stringer, E. Cooley, ve A. Christensen (Eds.), Pathways to prominence in neuropsychology: Reflections of 20th century pioneers (pp. 157–170). Psychology Press.

Karakaş, S., Erdoğan Bakar, E. ve Doğutepe Dinçer, E. (2013). BİLNOT bataryası el kitabı: nöropsikolojik testlerin yetişkinler için araştırma ve geliştirme çalışmaları: BİLNOT yetişkin (2. Baskı). Eğitim Yayınevi.

Kolb, B. ve Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Kolb, W. ve Whishaw, I. (2015). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.

Kreutzer, J. S., DeLuca, J. ve Caplan, B. (Eds.). (2018). Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed.). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9

Kudiaki, Ç. (2012). Nöropsikolojik değerlendirmenin aşamaları. Nöropsikoloji Dergisi, 1(1):14-22.

Laatsch, L. (2002). Neuropsychological Assessment. In M. Hersen ve W. Sledge (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychotherapy (pp. 223–229). Academic Press.

Latendorf, A., Runde, L. M., Salminen, T. ve Steinert, A. (2021). Digitization of neuropsychological diagnostics: a pilot study to compare three paper-based and digitized cognitive assessments. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(6), 1585–1597. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01668-z

Levin H. S. (1994). A guide to clinical neuropsychological testing. Archives of Neurology, 51(9), 854–859. doi:10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210024009

Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D. ve Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press.

Libon, D. J., Swenson, R., Ashendorf, L., Bauer, R. M. ve Bowers, D. (2013). Edith Kaplan and the Boston Process Approach. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1223–1233. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.833295

Libon, D. J., Swenson, R., Lamar, M., Price, C. C., Baliga, G., Pascual-Leone, A., Au, R., Cosentino, S. ve Andersen, S. L. (2022). The Boston Process Approach and Digital Neuropsychological Assessment: Past Research and Future Directions. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, 87(4), 1419–1432. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220096

Loring, D. W. (1999). INS dictionary of neuropsychology. Oxford University Press.

Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. Basic Books.

Luria, A. R. (1973). The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K. H. Pribram ve A. R. Luria, Psychophysiology of the frontal lobes. Academic Press.

Luria, A. R. (1980). Neuropsychology in the local diagnosis of brain damage. Clinical Neuropsychology, 2(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1080/01688638008403776

Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia rating scale. professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

Mendoza, J. E. (1997). Neuropsychological report writing: Format, content and issues. In Neuropsychology program/resource guide: Including guidelines for training, hiring, credentialing & practice (pp. B1– B13). Milwaukee, WI: National Center for Cost Containment, Department of Veterans Affairs.

Meyers, J. E. ve Rohling, M. L. (2004). Validation of the Meyers short battery on mild TBI patients. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 637–651.

Mikadze, Y.V., Ardila, A. ve Akhutina, T. V. (2018). A.R. Luria's Approach to Neuropsychological Assessment and Rehabilitation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 34(6), 795–802. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy095

Milberg, W. ve Hebben, N. (2013). Historical Foundations of the Boston Process Approach and the Roots of Modern Neuropsychology at the Boston VA Medical Center. The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment: a practitioner's guide, (pp. 3). Oxford University Press.

Mondini, S., Cappelletti, M. ve Arcara, G. (2022). Methodology in neuropsychological assessment: an interpretative approach to guide clinical practice (1st ed.). Routledge.

Morgan, J. E. ve Ricker, J. H. (Eds.). (2017). Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. Psychology Press.

Morris, R. G. ve Brookes, R. L. (2013). Neuropsychological assessment of older adults. In L. H. Goldstein ve J. E. McNeil (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: A practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians (2nd ed., pp. 347–373). Wiley Blackwell.

Öktem, Ö. (2003). Nöropsikoloji Uygulamaları. İçinde S. Karakaş, C. İrkeç ve N. Yüksel (Ed.), Beyin ve nöropsikoloji (temel ve klinik bilimler) (ss. 233–237). Çizgi Yayınevi.

Öktem, Ö. (2016). Nöropsikolojik değerlendirme. İçinde O. Tanrıdağ (Ed.), Davranış nörolojisi: beyin- davranış ilişkilerinin organizasyon prensipleri, sendromları ve hastalıkları (ss. 15–30). Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.

Palmer, B. W., Boone, K. B., Lesser, I. M. ve Wohl, M. A. (1998). Base rates of "impaired" neuropsychological test performance among healthy older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 13(6), 503– 511.

Poreh A. M. (2000). The quantified process approach: an emerging methodology to neuropsychological assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(2), 212–222. doi: 10.1076/1385- 4046(200005)14:2;1-Z;FT212

Rabin, L. A., Paolillo, E. ve Barr, W. B. (2016). Stability in test-usage practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada over a 10-year period: A follow-up survey of INS and NAN members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(3), 206-230.

Randolph, C., Tierney, M. C., Mohr, E. ve Chase, T. N. (1998). The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(3), 310–319. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823

Reed J. E. (1996). Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 14(3), 315–322. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199622)14:3<315::AID-BSL242>3.0.CO;2-X

Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 271-276.

Reitan, R.M. (1985). Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press.

Reitan, R. M. (1986). Theoretical and methodological bases of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. In I. Grant, ve K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 3–30). Oxford University Press.

Reitan, R.M. ve Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical ınterpretation (2nd Edition). Neuropsychology Press.

Reitan R. M. (1994). Ward Halstead's contributions to neuropsychology and the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1002/1097- 4679(199401)50:1<47::aid-jclp2270500106>3.0.co;2-x

Rourke, B.P. ve Brown, G.G. (1986). Clinical neuropsychology and behavioral neurology: Similarities and differences. In S.B.Filskov ve T.J.Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–18). John Wiley & Sons.

Russell, E.W. (1986). The psychometric foundation of clinical neuropsychology. In S.B.Filskov ve T.J.Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 45–80). John Wiley & Sons.

Russell, E. W. ve Starkey, R. I. (2001). Halstead, Russell neuropsychological evaluation system-revised [manual and computer program]. Western Psychological Services.

Salmon, D. P. ve Bondi, M. W. (2009). Neuropsychological assessment of dementia. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 257–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190024

Sbordone, R. J., Saul, R. E. ve Purisch, A. D. (2007). Neuropsychology for psychologists, health care professionals, and attorneys (3rd ed.). CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781420007138

Schoenberg, M. R. ve Scott, J. G. (Eds.). (2011). The little black book of neuropsychology: A syndrome- based approach. Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-76978-3

Shapiro, M. B. (1951). An experimental approach to diagnostic psychological testing. Journal of Mental Science, 97, 748–764.

Solovieva, Y. ve Quintanar, L. (2018). Luria’s syndrome analysis for neuropsychologicalassessment and rehabilitation. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 11(2), 81–99. doi: 10.11621/pir.2018.0207

Stern, R. A. ve White, T. (2003). NAB, neuropsychological assessment battery: administration, scoring, and interpretation manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

Stirling, J. ve Elliott, R. (2008). Introducing neuropsychology (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Stout, J. C., Paulsen, J. S., Queller, S., Solomon, A. C., Whitlock, K. B., Campbell, J. C., Carlozzi, N., Duff, K., Beglinger, L. J., Langbehn, D. R., Johnson, S. A., Biglan, K. M. ve Aylward, E. H. (2011). Neurocognitive signs in prodromal Huntington disease. Neuropsychology, 25(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1037/a0020937

Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. ve Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. American Chemical Society.

Sturm W. (2007). Neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Neurology, 254 Suppl 2, II12–II14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-2004-7

Sweet, J. J., Benson, L. M., Nelson, N. W. ve Moberg, P. J. (2021). The American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2020 survey of clinical neuropsychology practices in the United States: Part I. Professional practices, professional development, and time requirements. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(4), 725-760.

Sweet, J. J., Meyer, D. G., Nelson, N. W. ve Moberg, P. J. (2011). The TCN/AACN 2010 "salary survey": professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(1), 12–61. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.544165

Tupper D. E. (1999). Introduction: neuropsychological assessment après Luria. Neuropsychology Review, 9(2), 57–61. doi: 10.1023/a:1025693006186

Vanderploeg, R. D. (2000). Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates Publıshers.

Van Patten, R. (2021). Introduction to the Special Issue- Neuropsychology from a distance: Psychometric properties and clinical utility of remote neurocognitive tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(8), 767–773. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2021.2021645

Vermeent, S., Dotsch, R., Schmand, B., Klaming, L., Miller, J. B., & van Elswijk, G. (2020). Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770

Wedding, D. ve Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision making in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4(3), 233–265. doi: 10.1016/0887-6177(89)90016-4

Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler memory scale- revised manual. The Psychological Corparation.

Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and developmental psychology. Harvard Educational Review, 7, 353–368.

Woodard, J. L. (2010). Geriatric neuropsychological assessment. In P. A. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Handbook of assessment in clinical gerontology (2nd ed., pp. 461–501). Elsevier Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374961-1.10018-1

Yıldırım, E. (2022). Dijital Nöropsikoloji: Yaşlı Bireylerin Bilişsel İşlevlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Teknolojik Yaklaşımlar. Studies in Psychology, 42(1), 43-69. doi: 10.26650/SP2021- 963370

Zillmer, E. A. ve Spiers, M. V. (2008). Principles of neuropsychology. Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi