Basit Çizgilerden Anlamlı Temalara: Çevresel İpuçları, Hareket ve Şemalar Çerçevesinde Sahne Algısı

Bar, M. ve Ullman, S. (1996). Spatial context in recognition. Perception, 25(3), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1068/p250343

Bartnik, C. G. ve Groen, I. I. A. (2023). Visual Perception in the Human Brain: How the Brain Perceives and Understands Real-World Scenes. C. G. Bartnik ve I. I. A. Groen (Ed.) içinde, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (1-32). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.437

Bastin, J., Committeri, G., Kahane, P., Galati, G., Minotti, L., Lachaux, J. P. ve Berthoz, A. (2013). Timing of posterior parahippocampal gyrus activity reveals multiple scene processing stages. Human Brain Mapping, 34(6), 1357-1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21515

Bays, P. M. ve Husain, M. (2012). Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 12(8):8, 1-18. https://doi.org/ 10.1167/12.8.8

Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R.J. ve Rabinowitz, J.C. (1982). Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143–177, https://doi/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X

Bindemann, M. (2010). Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research, 50(23), 2577–2587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.016

Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F. ve Kingstone, A. (2009). Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Vision Research, 49, 2992–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.014

Bonner, M. F. ve Epstein, R. A. (2017). Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4793-4798. https://doi/10.1073/pnas.1618228114

Borghi, A. M. ve Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9, 351. https://doi.org//10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351

Cauchoix, M., Crouzet, S. M., Fize, D. ve Serre, T. (2016). Fast ventral stream neural activity enables rapid visual categorization. NeuroImage, 125, 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.012

Carpenter, C. M. ve Dennis, N. A. (2024). Investigating the neural basis of schematic false memories by examining schematic and lure pattern similarity. Memory, 32(10), 1271-1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2316169

Castelhano, M. S. ve Henderson, J. M. (2008). The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 660–675. https://doi/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660

Castelhano, M. S. ve Krzyś, K. (2020). Rethinking space: A review of perception, attention, and memory in scene processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 6(1), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-121219-081745

Chadwick, M. J., Mullally, S. L. ve Maguire, E. A. (2013). The hippocampus extrapolates beyond the view in scenes: An fMRI study of boundary extension. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 49(8), 2067–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.010

Chao, L. L. ve Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478-484. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0635

Cheng, A., Walther, D. B., Park, S. ve Dilks, D. D. (2021). Concavity as a diagnostic feature of visual scenes. NeuroImage, 232, 117920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117920

Chun, M. M. (2003). Scene perception and memory. D. E. Irwin ve B. H. Ross (Ed.) içinde, Cognitive vision (79–108). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01003-X

Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1098/rstb.2007.2054

Cisek, P. ve Kalaska, J. F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45(5), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027

Clark, A. (2024). The Experience Machine: How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality. Allen Lane / Penguin Press.

Coco, M. I., Nuthmann, A. ve Dimigen, O. (2020). Fixation-related brain potentials during semantic integration of object–scene information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01504

Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G. ve Umilta´, C. A. (1999). Action for perception: A motorvisual attention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1673

Crouzet, S. M., Kirchner, H. ve Thorpe, S. J. (2010). Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 10(4), 16-16. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.4.16

Davenport, J. L. ve Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15(8), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.09567976.2004.00719.x.

Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S. ve Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10010

Draschkow, D., Heikel, E., Vo, M. L. H., Fiebach, C. J. ve Sassenhagen, J. (2018). No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 120, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.016

Elder, J. H. (2018). Shape from contour: Computation and representation. Annual review of vision science, 4(1), 423-450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-091517034110

Ellis, R. ve Tucker, M. (2000). Microaffordance: The potentiation of actions by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451–471.

Epstein, R. (2005). The cortical basis of visual scene processing. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 954–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000607

Farrell, S., Ludwig, C. L., Ellis, L. A. ve Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 929–934. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906845107

Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C. ve Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra- rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 13(2), 171- 180. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901564234

Foulsham, T. (2015). Scene Perception. J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko ve A. Kingstone (Ed.) içinde, The Handbook of Attention (257-280). MIT Press.

Foulsham, T. ve Underwood, G. (2007). How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? Perception, 36, 1123-1138. https://doi.org/doi:10.1068/p5659

Foulsham, T. ve Underwood, G. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8(2):6, 1–17. https://doi.org/ doi: 10.1167/8.2.6

Foulsham, T., Walker, E. ve Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51(17), 1920-1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002

Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.108.3.316

Gandolfo, M., Nägele, H. ve Peelen, M. V. (2023). Predictive Processing of Scene Layout Depends on Naturalistic Depth of Field. Psychological Science, 34(3), 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221140341

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Greene, M. R. (2013). Statistics of high-level scene context. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 777, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00777

Greene, M. R. (2023). Scene Perception and Understanding. M. R. Greene (Ed.) içinde, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology (1-25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.883

Greene M. R., Baldassano C., Esteva, A., Beck, D. M., Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Visual scenes are categorized by function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000129

Greene, M. R., Botros, A. P., Beck, D. M. ve Fei-Fei, L. (2015). What you see is what you expect: Rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience. Attention Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0859-8

Greene, M. R. ve Hansen, B. C. (2020). Disentangling the independent contributions of visual and conceptual features to the spatiotemporal dynamics of scene categorization. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(27), 5283-5299. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2088-19.2020

Greene, M. R. ve Oliva, A. (2009). The briefest of glances: The time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science, 20(4), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x

Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. McGraw-Hill.

Gregorians, L. ve Spiers, H. J. (2022). Affordances for spatial navigation. Affordances in everyday life: A multidisciplinary collection of essays, 99-112.

Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis R., Passingham, R. E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17(12): 2735-40. https://doi/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x

Gordon, R. (2004). Attention and scene perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 760–777. https://doi/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.760.

Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S. ve Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6(4), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1031

Hansen, B. C. ve Loschky, L. C. (2013). The contribution of amplitude and phase spectra-defined scene statistics to the masking of rapid scene categorization. Journal of Vision, 13(13), 21. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.13.21

Harel, A., Groen, I. I. A., Kravitz, D. J., Deouell, L. Y. ve Baker, C. I. (2016). The temporal dynamics of scene processing: A multifaceted EEG investigation. eNeuro, 3(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0139-16.2016

Harel, A., Nador, J. D., Bonner, M. F. ve Epstein, R. A. (2022). Early Electrophysiological Markers of Navigational Affordances in Scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01810

Hassabis, D. ve Maguire, E. A. (2009). The construction system of the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0296

Henderson, J. M. (2011). Eye Movements and Scene Perception. S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist ve S. Everling (Ed.) içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements (594–606). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0033

Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S. ve Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. R. P. Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray ve R. L. Hill (Ed.) içinde, Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain (537-562). Elsevier.

Henderson, J. M. ve Ferreira, F. (2004). Scene perception for psycholinguists. J. M. Henderson ve F. Ferreira (Ed.) içinde, The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and The Visual World (1-58). Psychology Press. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488430

Henderson, J. M. ve Hayes, T. R. (2018). Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps. Journal of Vision, 18(6), 10-10. https://doi/10.1167/18.6.10

Henderson, J. M. ve Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243–71. https://doi/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243

Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C. ve Falk, R. J. (2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory and Cognition, 33: 98-106. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195300

Hollingworth, A. ve Henderson, J. M. (1999). Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: Evidence from object type and token discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 102(2-3), 319- 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00053-5

Hunt, A. M. ve Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1068

Intraub, H. (2012). Rethinking visual scene perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 3(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.149

Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V., Willey, E. V. ve Zuk, I. J. (1996). Boundary extension for briefly glimpsed photographs: Do common perceptual processes result in unexpected memory distortions? Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0007

Intraub, H. ve Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of closeup scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.179

Itti, L. ve Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7

Kamps, F. S., Julian, J. B., Kubilius, J., Kanwisher, N. ve Dilks, D. D. (2016). The occipital place area represents the local elements of scenes. NeuroImage, 132, 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.062

Keefer, L. A. (2009). Defending Noe's Enactive Theory of Perception (Doctoral dissertation, ScholarWorks@ Georgia State University).

Kirchner, H. ve Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002

Klein, R. M. ve Hilchey, M. D. (2011). Oculomotor inhibition of return. S. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist ve S. Everling (Ed.) içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements (471–492). Oxford University Press.

Kotowicz, A., Rutishauser, U. ve Koch, C. (2010). Time course of target recognition in visual search. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4:31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00031

Krugliak, A., Draschkow, D., Võ, M. L.‑H. ve Clarke, A. (2024). Semantic object processing is modulated by prior scene context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 39(8), 962–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2279083

Kutas, M. ve Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123

Land, M. F. ve Hayhoe, M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities. Vision Research, 41, 3559-3565. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X

Larson, A. M. ve Loschky, L. C. (2009). The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/ 10.1167/9.10.6

Loftus, G.R. ve Mackworth, N.H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565– 572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565

Long, B., Yu, C. P. ve Konkle, T. (2018). Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), E9015-E9024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719616115

Lowe, M. X., Rajsic, J., Ferber, S. ve Walther, D. B. (2018). Discriminating scene categories from brain activity within 100 milliseconds. Cortex, 106, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.006

Lu, A. Z. ve Henderson, J. M. (2025). Scene inversion impairs activation of scene-object semantic bias. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03139-x

Mack, Clarke, Erol ve Bert, (2017). Scene incongruity and attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 48, 87– 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.010

Malcolm, G. L., Groen, I. I. A. ve Baker, C. I. (2016). Making Sense of Real-World Scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.09.003

Maltempo, T., Pitzalis, S., Bellagamba, M., Di Marco, S., Fattori, P., Galati, G., ... ve Sulpizio, V. (2021). Lower visual field preference for the visuomotor control of limb movements in the human dorsomedial parietal cortex. Brain Structure and Function, 226(9), 2989-3005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02254-3

Marr, D. (1982). The philosophy and the approach. Visual perception: Essential readings, 104-123.

Müller Karoza, L. A., Wiesmann, S. L. ve Võ, M. L.-H. (2025). The role of anchor objects in scene function understanding. Scientific Reports, 15, 20247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04122-0

Nicholls, V. I., Krugliak, A., Alsbury-Nealy, B., Gramann, K. ve Clarke, A. (2025). Contextual expectations in the real-world modulate low-frequency neural oscillations. Imaging Neuroscience, 3. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00568

Oliva, A. ve Schyns, P. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176–210. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0728

Oliva, A. ve Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139631724

Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y. ve Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014

Özdoğan, L. B. (2023). Resimsel Uzamdan, Teatral Uzama: 20. Yüzyılın İlk Çeyreğinde Sahne Tasarımı Yapan Sanatçılar. 8gen-ART, 3(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.53463/8genart.202300208

Peirce, J. W. (2015). Understanding mid-level representations in visual processing. Journal of Vision, 15(7):5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.7.5

Rensink, R. A. (2000). Scene Perception. A. E. Kazdin (Ed.) içinde, Encyclopedia of Psychology (151-155). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10522-061

Rietveld, E. ve Kiverstein, J. (2014). A Rich Landscape of Affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325– 352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035

Posner, M. I. ve Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. H. Bouma ve D. Bouwhuis (Ed.) içinde, Attention and Performance X (531-556). Erlbaum.

Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187(4180), 965-966.

Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509

Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Hagmann, C. E. ve McCourt, E. S. (2014). Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(2), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z

Race, E., Keane, M. M. ve Verfaellie, M. (2011). Medial temporal lobe damage causes deficits in episodic memory and episodic future thinking not attributable to deficits in narrative construction. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(28), 10262-10269. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1145-11.2011

Renninger, L. W. ve Malik, J. (2004). When is scene identification just texture recognition?. Vision Research, 44(19), 2301-2311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.006

Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L. ve Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. C. Umiltà ve M. Moscovitch (Ed.) içinde, Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (232–265). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1478.003.0016

Sayın, E. ve Alkan, A. (2024). Türk Sahne Sanatları’nda Sahne Ve Seyircinin Evrimi. Baçini Sanat Dergisi, 2(4), 44-63.

Schyns, P. G. ve Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time- and spatial-seale- dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5(4), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x

Spotorno, S. ve Tatler, B. W. (2017). The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1717-1743. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000456

Spotorno, S., Tatler, B. W. ve Faure, S. (2013). Semantic consistency versus perceptual salience in visual scenes: Findings from change detection. Acta Psychologica, 142, 168–176. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.009

Taşdelen, M. (2022). Deneysel Tiyatro Sahnelerine Parametrik Biçim Grameri ile Sahne ve Parter Düzeni Önerilmesi. Journal of Computational Design, 3(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.981647

Tatler, B. W. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 7(14):4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.14.4

Tatler, B. W. (2014). Eye movements from laboratory to life. M. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. A. Knight ve R. Reilly (Ed.) içinde, Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research (17-35). Springer.

Tatler, B. W. ve Vincent, B. T. (2008). Systematic tendencies in scene viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.2.5

Thorpe, S., Fize, D. ve Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520-522. https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0

Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A. ve Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493-498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875

Torralba, A. ve Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: computation in neural systems, 14(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302

Treisman, A. M. ve Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

Tucker, M. ve Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.830

Türkan, B. N., İyilikci, O. ve Amado, S. (2021). Ways of processing semantic information during different change detection tasks. Visual Cognition, 29(6), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1927276

Türkan, B.N., Schöpper, LM., Vainio, L. ve Frings, C. (2026). When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association. Attention Perception, & Psychophysics, 88, 24. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03202-7

Vainio, L., Ala-Salomäki, H., Huovilainen, T., Nikkinen, H., Salo, M., Väliaho, J. ve Paavilainen, P. (2014). Mug handle affordance and automatic response inhibition: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(9), 1697–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.868007

Vainio, L., Hammaren, L., Hausen, M., Rekolainen, E. ve Riskilä, S. (2011). Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64(6), 1094–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.538221

Vainio, L., Tiippana, K., Peromaa, T., Kuuramo, C. ve Kurki, I. (2022). Negative affordance effect: Automatic response inhibition triggered by handle orientation of non-target object. Psychological Research, 86(6), 1737–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01600-8

van Elk, M., van Schie, H. ve Bekkering, H. (2014). Action semantics: A unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(2), 220-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.005

Vater, C., Wolfe, B. ve Rosenholtz, R. (2022). Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(5), 1531-1557. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02117-w

Võ, M. L.-H. (2021). The meaning and structure of scenes. Vision Research, 181, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.11.003

Võ, M. L. H., Boettcher, S. E. ve Draschkow, D. (2019). Reading scenes: How scene grammar guides attention and aids perception in real-world environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 205- 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.009

Võ, M. L. ve Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.3.24

Võ, M. L. ve Wolfe, J. M. (2013). Differential ERP signatures elicited by semantic and syntactic processing in scenes. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476955

Walther, D. B. ve Shen, D. (2014). Nonaccidental properties underlie human categorization of complex natural scenes. Psychological Science, 25(4), 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512662

Warman, A., Clark, A., Malcolm, G. L., Havekost, M. ve Rossit, S. (2024). Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(11), 2151-2164. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241230812

Warren, W.H. (1990). The Perception-Action Coupling. H. Bloch, ve B.I. Bertenthal (Ed.) içinde, Sensory- Motor Organizations and Development in Infancy and Early Childhood. NATO ASI Series, 56 (23- 37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2071-2

Wokke, M. E., Knot, S. L., Fouad, A. ve Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2016). Conflict in the kitchen: Contextual modulation of responsiveness to affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.007

Wu, C. C., Wick, F. A. ve Pomplun, M. (2014). Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00054

Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye Movements And Vision. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-

Yamada, R. ve Itsukushima, Y. (2013). The effects of schema on recognition memories and subjective experiences for actions and objects. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12016

Zelinsky, G. J. (2001). Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194463