Şüpheli Kadın Ölümleri Bağlamında Azınlık Etkisi: Kadın Hakları Savunuculuğu ve Grup Kimliğinin Rolü

Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A. ve Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x

Aebischer, V., Hewstone, M. R. ve Henderson, M. (1984). Minority influence and musical preference: Innovation by conversion not coercion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140103

Alvaro, E. M. ve Crano, W. D. (1996). Cognitive responses to minority or majority-based communications: Factors that underlie minority influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01086.x

Alvaro, E. M. ve Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 949-964. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.949

Anıt Sayaç. (2025). Şiddetten Ölen Kadınlar İçin Dijital Anıt. https://anitsayac.com (Erişim tarihi: 31 Ekim 2025)

Baker, S. M. ve Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.5

Baron, R. S. ve Bellman, S. B. (2007). No guts, no glory: Courage, harassment and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.341

Beckwith, K. (2000). Beyond compare? Women's movements in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 37(4), 431-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00521

Bohner, G., Erb, H-P., Reinhard, M. ve Frank, E. (1996). Distinctiveness across topics in minority and majority influence: An attributional analysis and preliminary data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01081.x

Bohner, G., Frank, E. ve Erb, H-P. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 855-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5<855::AID-EJSP894>3.0.CO;2-P

Brandstätter, V., Ellemers, N., Gaviria, E., Giosue, F., Huguet, P., Kroon, M., Morchain, P., Pujal, M., Rubini, M., Mugny, G. ve Perez, J. A. (1991). Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(3), 199- 211. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210303

Butera, F., Vernet, J.-P. ve Vala, J. (2017). Influencing people's (negative) attitudes towards active minorities: The case of feminist movements. S. Papastamou, A. Gardikiotis ve G. Prodromitis (Ed.), Majority and minority influence: Societal meaning and cognitive elaboration içinde (ss. 158-172). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666648-8

Choi, H.-S. ve Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016S0022-1031(03)00101-X

Clark, R. D. ve Maass, A. (1988a). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180405

Clark, R. D. ve Maass, A. (1988b). The role of social categorization and perceived source credibility in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(5), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180502

Crano, W. D. ve Alvaro, E. M. (1997). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. European Review of Social Psychology, 8(1), 175-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779643000119

Crano, W. D. ve Alvaro, E. M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298012001

Crano, W. D. ve Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1437-1450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1437

David, B. ve Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The in-group minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164086

De Dreu, C. K. W. ve De Vries, N. K. (1996). Differential processing and attitude change following majority versus minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01084.x

De Dreu, C. K. W., De Vries, N. K., Gordijn, E. H. ve Schuurman, M. S. (1999). Convergent and divergent processing of majority and minority arguments: Effects on focal and related attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<329::AID-EJSP930>3.0.CO;2-6

De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E. ve Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. European Review of Social Psychology, 7(1), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779643000001

Doms, M. ve Van Avermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority influence and conversion behavior: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90071-2

El-Alayli, A., Park, E. S., Messé, L. A. ve Kerr, N. L. (2002). Having to Take a Stand: The Interactive Effects of Task Framing and Source Status on Attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(3), 233- 248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430202005003004

Gardikiotis, A. (2011). Minority influence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(9), 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00377.x

Gardikiotis, A., Martin, R. ve Hewstone, M. (2005). Group consensus in social influence: Type of consensus information as a moderator of majority and minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277807

Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C. ve de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068

Goodman, J. A., Alexander, M. G., Chizhik, A. W., Chizhik, E. W. ve Eidelman, S. (2010). Indirect influence and divergent thinking as a function of member status and task structure in small groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1184-1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.713

Gordijn, E. H., de Vries, N. K. ve de Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attributions, and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1315-1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236819

Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F. ve Karau, S. J. (1999). Effects of source expertise and physical distance on minority influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.3.1.81

Harvey, O. J. ve Consalvi, C. (1960). Status and conformity to pressures in informal groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(2), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044036

Hayashi, Y. (2018). The power of a “maverick” in collaborative problem solving: An experimental investigation of individual perspective‐taking within a group. Cognitive Science, 42(S1), 69-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12587

Imhoff, R. ve Erb, H-P. (2009). What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208328166

Joule, R. V., Mugny, G. ve Pérez, J. A. (1998). When a compliance without pressure strategy fails due to a minority dissenter: A case of “behavioral conversion”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(6), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180607

Kadın Cinayetlerini Durduracağız Platformu. (2025). Veriler. https://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net (Erişim tarihi: 31 Ekim 2025)

Kelley, H. H. ve Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457-501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325

Kende, J., Reiter, J., Coşkan, C., Doosje, B. ve Green, E. G. T. (2022). The role of minority discrimination and political participation in shaping majority perceptions of discrimination: Two cross-national studies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221075711

Kerr, N. L. (2002). When is a minority a minority? Active versus passive minority advocacy and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.103

Kim, J.-H. ve Kim, J. (2015). The dynamics of polarization and compromise in conflict situations: The interaction between cultural traits and majority-minority influence. Communication Monographs, 84(1), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1075655

Kimbal, R. K. ve Hollander, E. P. (1974). Independence in the presence of an experienced but deviate group member. Journal of Social Psychology, 93(2), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1974.9923162

Koseki, Y. (1989). A study of the influence of deviant minority on visual judgments within a small group. Japanese Psychological Research, 31(4), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.31.149

Kozakaï, T., Moscovici, S. ve Personnaz, B. (1994). Contrary effects of group cohesiveness in minority influence: Intergroup categorization of the source and levels of influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 713-718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240608

Kruglanski, A. W. ve Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.212

Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G. ve Perez, J. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 359-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210408

Lortie-Lussier, M., Lemieux, S. ve Godbout, L. (1989). Reports of a public manifestation: Their impact according to minority influence theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9712046

Maass, A. ve Clark, R. D. (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(3), 197- 215.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420130302

Maass, A. ve Clark, R. D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 428-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.428

Maass, A., Clark, R. D. ve Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120107

Maass, A., Volpato, C. ve Mucci-Faina, A. (1996). Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion: Attitudinal versus objective items. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01080.x

Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.41

Mackie, D. M., Gastardo-Conaco, M. C. ve Skelly, J. J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292182005

Martin, R. (1988a). Ingroup and outgroup minorities: Differential impact upon public and private responses. European Journal of Social Psychology 18(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180104

Martin, R. (1988b). Minority influence and “trivial” social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology 18(5), 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180508

Martin, R. (1988c). Minority influence and social categorization: A replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180407

Martin, R. (1996). Minority influence and argument generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01085.x

Martin, R., Gardikiotis, A. ve Hewstone, M. (2002). Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(5), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.113

Martin, R. ve Hewstone, M. (2003). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.146

Martin, R. ve Hewstone, M. (Ed.) (2010). Introduction: Theory and research on minority influence. Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes, and Consequences içinde (s. 5). Psychology Press.

Martin, R., Hewstone, M. ve Martin, P.Y. (2003). Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 585-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00037-4

Martin, R., Hewstone, M. ve Martin, P.Y. (2007). Systematic and heuristic processing of majority- and minority-endorsed messages: The effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294251

Martin, R., Hewstone, M. ve Martin, P. Y. (2008). Majority versus minority influence: The role of message processing in determining resistance to counter-persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.426

McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W. ve Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face- to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 706-718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706

Moral-Toranzo, F., Canto-Ortiz, J. ve Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2007). Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1660-1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.002

Mortensen, C. R., Neel, R., Cialdini, R. B., Jaeger, C. M., Jacobson, R. P. ve Ringel, M. M. (2019). Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617734615

Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1

Moscovici, S. ve Doms, M. (1982). Compliance and conversion in a situation of sensory deprivation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0302_1

Moscovici, S. ve Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence: III. Majority versus minority influence in a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6(2), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420060202

Moscovici, S. ve Lage, E. (1978). Studies in social influence: IV. Minority influence in a context of original judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080307

Moscovici, S., Lage, E. ve Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541

Moscovici, S. ve Personnaz, B. (1980). Studies in social influence: V. Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(3), 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90070-0

Moscovici, S. ve Personnaz, B. (1986). Studies on latent influence by the spectrometer method I: The impact of psychologization in the case of conversion by a minority or a majority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420160404

Moscovici, S. ve Personnaz, B. (1991). Studies on latent influence by the spectrometer method VI: Is Lenin orange or red? Imagery and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210202

Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). The mediational effects of attributions and information processing in minority social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01082.x

Mucchi-Faina, A. ve Cicoletti, G. (2006). Divergence vs. ambivalence: Effects of personal relevance on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.278

Mucchi-Faina, A., Maass, A. ve Volpato, C. (1991). Social influence: The role of originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(3), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210302

Mucchi-Faina, A. ve Pagliaro, S. (2008). Minority influence: The role of ambivalence toward the source. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 612-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.486

Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. Academic Press.

Mugny, G. (1984). Compliance, conversion and the Asch paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(4), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140402

Mugny, G. ve Papastamou, S. (1980). When rigidity does not fail: Individualization and psychologization as resistances to the diffusion of minority innovation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10(1), 43- 61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420100104

Mugny, G. ve Papastamou, S. (1982). Minority influence and psycho-social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(4), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120405

Mugny, G., Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P. ve Pérez, J. A. (1991). Independence and interdependence of group judgments: Xenophobia and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(3), 213- 223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420210304

Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23

Nemeth, C. J. ve Brilmayer, A. G. (1987). Negotiation versus influence. European Journal of Social Psychology,17(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420170105

Nemeth, C. J. ve Kwan, J. L. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033688

Nemeth, C. J. ve Kwan, J. L. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(9), 788-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00339.x

Nemeth, C. J., Swedlund, M. ve Kanki, B. (1974). Patterning of the minority responses and their influence on the majority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420040104

Nemeth, C. ve Wachtler, J. (1973). Consistency and modification of judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90063-2

Nemeth, C. ve Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37(4), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786425

Nemeth, C. J. ve Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420130103

Nemeth, C., Wachter, J. ve Endicott, J. (1977). Increasing the size of the minority: Some gains and some losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420070103

Ng, K. Y. ve Van Dyne, L. (2001). Individualism–collectivism as a boundary condition for effectiveness of minority influence in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 198-225. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2927

Paicheler, G. (1976). Norms and attitude change I: Polarization and style of behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420060402

Paicheler, G. (1977). Norms and attitude change II: The phenomenon of bipolarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420070102

Paicheler, G. (1979). Polarization of attitudes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090107

Papastamou, S. ve Mugny, G. (1990). Synchronic consistency and psychologization in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200202

Park, G. ve DeShon, R. P. (2010). A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision- making effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 824-833. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019939

Pérez, J. A. ve Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420170204

Personnaz, B. (1981). Study in social influence using the spectrometer method: Dynamics of the phenomena of conversion and covertness in perceptual responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11(4), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420110407

Peterson, R. S. ve Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296221002

Prislin, R. (2022). Minority influence: An agenda for study of social change. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 911654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911654

Prislin, R., Davenport, C., Xu, Y., Moreno, R., Honeycutt, N. (2018). From marginal to mainstream and vice versa: Leaders’ valuation of diversity while in the minority versus majority. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12259

Prislin, R., Limbert, W. M. ve Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.79.3.385

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology içinde (Vol.10, ss. 173–220). Academic Press.

Sah, Y. J. ve Peng, W. (2023). Context-dependent online social influence: Effect of majority and minority comments on posters and lurkers. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1316-1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211070527

Sakallı, N. (2001a). Kadın hakları Farklı terimler farklı tutumlar. Tecrübi Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 22, 1-13.

Sakallı, N. (2001b). Sosyal etkiler: Kim kimi nasıl etkiler. İmge Kitabevi Yayınları

San Martin, A., Swaab, R., Sinaceur, M. ve Vasiljevic, D. (2015). The double-edge impact of future expectations in groups: Minority influence depends on minorities’ and majorities’ expectations to interact again. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 128, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.002

Schakelford, S., Wood, W. ve Worchel, S. (1996). Behavioral styles and the influence of women in mixed sex-groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 284-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787024

Shuper, P. A. ve Sorrentino, R. M. (2004). Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: Processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.2.127-148

Sinaceur, M., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Neale, M. A., O’Neill, O. A. ve Haag, C. (2010). Accuracy and perceived expert status in group decisions: When minority members make majority members more accurate privately. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209353349

Smith, C. M. (2008). Adding minority status to a source of conflict: An examination of influence processes and product quality in dyads. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.423

Smith, C. M., Dykema-Engblade, A., Walker, A., Niven, T. S. ve McGough, T. (2000). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups discussing the death penalty: A shared representations interpretation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3(4), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003004004

Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034782

Summers, G. ve Feldman, N. S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spouse abuse. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1984.2.4.339

Tomasetto, C., Mucci-Faina, A., Alparone, F. R. ve Pagliaro, S. (2009). Differential effects of majority and minority influence on argumentation strategies. Social Influence, 4(1), 33- 45.https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802257510

Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Academic Press.

Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An intergrative theory of intergroup conflict. W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde (ss. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

Trost, M. R., Maass, A. ve Kenrick, D. T. (1992). Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(3), 234- 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90054-N

Twenge, J. M. ve Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed- and open- ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x

Tversky, A. ve Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

Üzümçeker, E. ve Akfırat, S. (2018). Kadın cinayetlerine yönelik atıfların cinsiyet grubuyla özdeşleşme, çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ve siyasi ideolojilerle ilişkisi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 38(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP372013

Van Dyne, L. ve Saavedra, R. (1996). A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects of divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 151- 167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01089.x

Vernet, J. P. ve Butera, F. (2003). Guilt for cryptomnesia moderates attitudes towards feminists. New Review of Social Psychology, 2, 16-20.

Vernet, J. P. ve Butera, F. (2005). Women, women rights and feminist movements. Social Science Information, 44(1), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405050465

Vernet, J.-P., Vala, J., Amâncio, L. ve Butera, F. (2009). Conscientization of social cryptomnesia reduces hostile sexism and rejection of feminists. Social Psychology, 40(3), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.130

Vernet, J. P., Vala, J. ve Butera, F. (2011). Can men promote feminist movements?: Outgroup influence sources reduce attitude change toward feminist movements. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210398013

Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A. ve Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200204

Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K. ve Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1181-1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181

Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S. ve Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta- analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323

Yamawaki, N., Ostenson, J. ve Ryan Brown, C. (2009). The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence Against Women, 15(9), 1126-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209340758