Anahtar Kelimeler
Q yöntemi
zorlu çatışmalar
sosyal kimlik
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de yaşayan insanların Ermeni meselesine yönelik bakış açılarını Q yöntemini kullanarak incelemektir. Alan araştırması Türkiye’de farklı dini ve siyasi görüşlere sahip 40 yetişkin katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılardan Ermeni meselesi ile ilgili 41 fikir kartını “tamamen destekliyorum” (+4) ile “hiç desteklemiyorum” (-4) arasında sıralamaları istenmiştir. Veriler PQMethod 2.35 programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, Ermeni meselesinin farklı yönlerini temsil eden üç bakış açısının olduğunu göstermektedir: 1) Savaş koşullarının ve karşılıklı acıların bir sonucu olarak Ermeni meselesi, 2) Bir soykırım olarak Ermeni meselesi ve tek (siyasi) sorumlu taraf olarak Türkiye Devleti ve 3) ABD ve Rusya gibi küresel güçlerin etkisinde olarak Ermeni meselesi. Ayrıca sonuçlar katılımcıların bu meselede hemfikir oldukları ve olmadıkları bakış açılarını da göstermiştir. Katılımcılar bu sorunun çözümü için her iki ülkeden araştırma kurumları ve STK’ların bilimsel çalışmalar ve çeşitli faaliyetler yürütmesi ve diplomatik ilişkilerin yeniden başlatılması gibi karşılıklı adımları vurgulayan görüşlerde fikir birliğindedir. Ancak soykırımın tanınması talebi ve resmi özür talebi gibi Ermeni meselesinin çözümüne yönelik siyasi önerileri içeren görüşlerde ayrışmışlardır. Son olarak tüm katılımcılar “sorunun asıl mağdurlarının Anadolu’da yaşamakta olan Ermeniler olduğu” ve “pek çok Türk’ün Ermenilere karşı ön yargılı olduğu” yönündeki Q ifadelerine katılım göstermiştir.
Referanslar
Akçam, T. (1995). Türk ulusal kimliği ve Ermeni sorunu (4. Baskı) [Turkish national identity and the Armenian question (4th ed.)]. İletişim Yayınları.
Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS). (2005). The Armenian genocide: 90 years and waiting. Date accessed: 29/12/2024. https://acnis.am/archive/pr/genocide/Socio13eng.pdf
Bar-Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21(2), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00192
Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430-1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
Bar-Tal, D. (2012). Siege mentality. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology (pp. 996- 999.) Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp249
Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025195
Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar- Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11-38). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195166439.003.0002
Bar-Tal, D., & Y. Teichman (2005). Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli Jewish society. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499814
Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Halperin, E., & Zafran, A. (2012). Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026860
Bilali, R. (2013). National narrative and social psychological influences in Turks’ denial of the mass killings of Armenians as genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12001
Bilali, R., Tropp, L. R., & Dasgupta, N. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026671
Bilgin. N. (2005). Türk-Ermeni sorununda Ariadne’nin ipliği [Ariadne’s thread in the Turkish-Armenian conflict]. Farklı yönleriyle Ermeni sorunu [The Armenian question in its different aspects] (pp. 269- 277). Nergiz Yayınları.
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 44-46). Psychology Press.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Cairns, E., & Roe, M. D. (Ed.). (2003). The role of memory in ethnic conflict. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919823
Caucasus Research Resource Center-Armenia (CRRC). (2015). Towards a shared vision of normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations. Date accessed: 29/12/2024. https://www.armenia-turkey.net/uploaded/CRRC-Presentation_Eng_21.04.2015.pdf
Çiçek, K. (2005). Ermenilerin zorunlu göçü (1915-1917) [The Forced migration of Armenians (1915-1917)]. Turkish Historical Society Publications.
Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemoller, M., & Bergsma, E. (2010). Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 69(3), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005
Dağlıoğlu, E. C. (2020). 12 Eylül rejimi ve Türkiyeli Ermeni kimliğinin yeniden dizaynı [The 12 September regime and the redesign of Armenian identity in Turkey]. In A. Yılmaz (Ed.), Critical approaches to Armenian identity in the 21st century: Vulnerability, resilience and transformation (pp. 165.183). Hrant Dink Foundation Publications.
Danielson, S. (2009). Q method and surveys: Three ways to combine Q and R. Field Methods, 21(3), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09332082
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Görgülü, A. (2008). Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkileri: Bir kısır döngü [Turkey-Armenia relations: A vicious circle]. TESEV Publications.
Hakim, N., Branscombe, N., & Schoemann, A. (2021). Group-based emotions and support for reparations: A meta-analysis. Affective Science, 2(4), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00055-9
Halaçoğlu, Y. (2005). Ermenilerin Suriye’ye nakli: Sürgün mü soykırım mı? Belgeler [Transfer of Armenians to Syria: Exile or genocide? Documents]. Turkish Historical Society Publications.
Hameiri, B., & Halperin E. (2015). Sociopsychological barriers to peacemaking and overcoming them: A review of new psychological interventions. E. Halperin, & K. Sharvit (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts celebrating the legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal (Vol I) (pp. 173-188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17861-5_13
Hanioğlu, M. Ş. (1995). The Young Turks in opposition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195091151.001.0001
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory (pp. 3-17). Springer.
Jost, J. T. (2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674247192
Karasu, M., & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2020). Doing research on Turkish-Armenian relations in Turkey, Armenia, and the Armenian Diaspora: The challenges and opportunities of Turkish researchers in the field. In Y. G. Acar, S. M. Moss, & Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict, and power in the field (pp. 63- 83). Springer.
Karasu, M., Mehmetoğlu, E., Tuzkaya, F., & Göregenli, M. (2017). Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkileri ve temsiller: Ermenistan’dan bir bakış [Türkiye-Armenia relations and representations: An outlook from Armenia]. In A. Güvenç Saygın (Ed.), International symposium on the effects of Turkish-Armenian relations on the regional policies (from the 19th century to present day) proceedings (pp. 419-442). Atatürk Research Center Publications.
Karasu, M., Yeşilyaprak, R., & Göregenli, M. (2020). ‘1915’ from the perspective of the youth: Türkiye- Armenian comparison. In A. Yılmaz (Ed.), Critical approaches to Armenian identity in the 21st century: vulnerability, resilience, and transformation (pp. 53-78). Hrant Dink Foundation Publications.
Kriesberg, L. (1998). Intractable conflicts. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332-342). Continuum.
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985512
Oren, N. (2019). Israels national identity: The changing ethos of conflict. Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/97816 26377 967- 003
Oren, N., Bar-Tal, D., & David, O. (2004). Conflict, identity and ethos: The Israeli-Palestinian case. In Y-T. Lee, C. R. McCauley, F. M. Moghaddam, & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of ethnic and cultural conflict (pp. 133-154). Praeger. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216002703.0014
Özdoğan, G. G., & Kılıçdağı, O. (2012). Hearing Turkey’s Armenians: Issues, demands and policy recommendations (2nd ed.). TESEV Publications.
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1313-1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x
Schmolck, P. (2014). PQMethod2.35 [computer software]. Retrieved from http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/
Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., & Colucc, F. P. (2015). To feel of not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1223-1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215592843
Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q methodology. In J. Smith, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 178-192). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221792.n12
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
Ulug, O. M. (2016). Subjective understandings of the Kurdish conflict: A Q methodological investigation among parliamentarians, experts and lay people in Turkey [PhD thesis]. Jacobs University.
Ulug, O. M., & Cohrs, J. C. (2016). An exploration of lay people’s Kurdish conflict frames in Turkey. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000165
Vollhardt, J. R., Mazur, L. B., & Lemahieu, M. (2014). Acknowledgment after mass violence: Effects on psychological well-being and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(3), 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517270
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251911
Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Social and Environmental Research Institute.
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2004). Importance of social categorization for forgiveness and collective guilt assignment for the Holocaust. In N. Branscombe, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt international perspectives (pp. 284-305). Cambridge University Press.
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R. & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600574815
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi