Çevre Yanlısı Kolektif Eylemler: Sosyal Kimlik Perspektifinden Bir Derleme Çalışması ve Öneriler

Acar, Y. G. (2018). Gezi’den sonra ne oldu? Güçlenmenin, politikleşmenin ve örgütlenmenin kolektif eylemlerdeki rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21, 62-78.

Al Damkhı, A. M. (2008). Environmental ethics in Islam: Principles, violations, and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65 (1), 11-31. 10.1080/00207230701859724.

Ataöv, A. ve Peker, E. (2021). Co-designing local climate action: A methodological framework from a democratic perspective. In Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Exploring Cross-Scale Dynamics (ss. 147-164). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_9.

Aydın, E., Bagci, S. C. ve Kelesoglu, İ. (2022). Love for the globe but also the country matter for the environment: Links between nationalistic, patriotic, global identification and pro- environmentalism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101755.

Bamberg, S., Rees, J. H. ve Schulte, M. (2018). Environmental protection through societal change: What psychology knows about collective climate action—and what it needs to find out. In Psychology and Climate Change (ss. 185-213). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00008-4.

Bamberg, S., Rees, J. ve Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006.

Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. A. Bandura, ed. Self- Efficacy in Changing Societies. New york: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.003.

Bartels, J., & Hoogendam, K. (2011). The role of social identity and attitudes toward sustainability brands in buying behaviors for organic products. Journal of Brand Management, 18(9), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.3.

Barth, M., Masson, T., Fritsche, I., Fielding, K. ve Smith, J. R. (2021). Collective responses to global challenges: The social psychology of pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101562.

Baykan, B. G. (2019). What did the Turkish climate movement learn from a global policy failure? Frame shift after the Copenhagen Climate Summit. Turkish Studies, 20(4), 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1601563.

Becker, J. C. ve Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615.

Belam, M. ve Staff, G. (2019). Greta Thunberg: Teenager on a global mission to “make a difference.”. The Guardian, 26.

Bicchieri, C. ve Muldoon, R. (2014). Social norms. In Edward N. Zalta Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/social-norms/

Brader, T. ve Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In Leonie Huddy, Jack S. Levy ve David O. Sears (Eds), Oxford Handbook Of Political Psychology, 165–204. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0006

Britt, T. W. (1999). Engaging the self in the field: Testing the triangle model of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 698-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006005.

Brügger, A., Gubler, M., Steentjes, K. ve Capstick, S. B. (2020). Social identity and risk perception explain participation in the Swiss youth climate strikes. Sustainability, 12(24), 10605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410605.

Carmona-Moya, B., Calvo-Salguero, A. ve Aguilar-Luzón, M. D. C. (2021). EIMECA: a proposal for a model of environmental collective action. Sustainability, 13(11), 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115935.

Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4(1), 3. Doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3.

Cheung, W. Y., Luke, M. A. ve Maio, G. R. (2014). On attitudes towards humanity and climate change: The effects of humanity esteem and self‐transcendence values on environmental concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2037.

Chu, H. ve Yang, J. Z. (2019). Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change. Science Communication, 41(6), 761-789. s://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019889637.

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. Identity and The Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, pp.45-65. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0005.

Clayton, S. ve Kılınç, A. (2013). Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: The role of national and environmental identity. Psyecology, 4(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749850.

Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simões, P. ve Barata, E. (2017). Affect and the adoption of pro- environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008.

Cohen-Chen, S. ve Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016.

Collier, R.B. ve Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.85.

Della Porta, D. (2022). Social Movements in the Emergence of a Global Pandemic. In Social Movements and Politics During COVID-19 (pp. 131-133). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2qnx5gh.20.

Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.003.

Drury, J. ve Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231.

Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000013

Ettinger, J., Walton, P., Painter, J. ve DiBlasi, T. (2021). Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos. Climatic Change, 164(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02975-8.

Ferguson, M. A. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010.

Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R. ve Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003.

Fielding, K. S. ve Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 171214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.

Fridays for future (28/05/2022). Bu Bir Hareket. https://fridaysforfuture.org/. Son erişim tarihi 16/05/2023.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.

Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T. ve Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro- environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090.

Fritsche, I., Cohrs, J. C., Kessler, T. ve Bauer, J. (2012). Global warming is breeding social conflict: The subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.002.

Fritsche, I. ve Masson, T. (2021). Collective climate action: When do people turn into collective environmental agents?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.05.001.

Fritz, L., Hansmann, R., Dalimier, B. ve Binder, C. R. (2023). Perceived impacts of the Fridays for Future climate movement on environmental concern and behaviour in Switzerland. Sustainability Science, 18(5), 2219-2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01348-7.

Furlong, C. ve Vignoles, V. L. (2021). Social identification in collective climate activism: Predicting participation in the environmental movement, extinction rebellion. Identity, 21(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2020.1856664

Geiger, N., Dwyer, T. ve Swim, J. K. (2023). Hopium or empowering hope? A meta-analysis of hope and climate engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1139427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139427.

Gezici-Yalçın, M. ve Uluğ, Ö. M. (2017). “Gezi, bardağı taşıran son damlaydı”: Sosyal psikolojik bir perspektifle Gezi Parkı isyanını anlamak. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(96-109).

Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T. ve Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502093514.

Gulliver, R., Fielding, K. S. ve Louis, W. R. (2021). Assessing the mobilization potential of environmental advocacy communication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101563.

Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W. ve Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005.

Hofmann, W., Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., Rockenbach, B. ve Skitka, L. J. (2018). Moral Punishment in Everyday Life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(12), 1697- 1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218775075

Iguisi, O., (1997). Culture dimensions to appropriate management and sustainable development in Africa: seminar report, UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. France. Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/0rxwh59 on 31 Aug 2024. COI: 20.500.12592/0rxwh59.

Johnson, N. ve Reimer, T. (2023). Using the social identity model of pro-environmental behavior to predict support for the adoption of solar panels. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 13(4), 587- 601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00850-9.

Keshavarzi, S., McGarty, C. ve Khajehnoori, B. (2021). Testing social identity models of collective action in an Iranian environmental movement. Journal of Community ve Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2523.

Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319-331. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319.

Klandermans, P. G. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell.

Kohler, T. A. ve Gumerman, G. G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes. Oxford University Press.

Landmann, H. ve Rohmann, A. (2020). Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.10149.

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.

Li, Q., Zhao, L., Zhao, Z., Yang, Y. ve Wang, Y. (2019). The Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action and its applicability analysis in China. Advances in Psychology, 9(06), 993-1001. Doi: 10.12677/AP.2019.96122

Loy, L. S., Bauer, M. ve Wullenkord, M. C. (2024). How dare we? The relation between language use, global identity, and climate activism. Global Environmental Psychology, 2, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.11101.

Macy, M. W. ve Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117.

Nelson, J. A., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Hurt, M. M., Ramsey, L. R., Turner, D. L. ve Haines, M. E. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721- 728. Doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0.

Ng, S. ve Basu, S. (2019). Global identity and preference for environmentally friendly products: the role of personal responsibility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(8), 919-936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119873432.

Özkan, Z., Ünver-Aba, H., Kızık, B, Eraslan E, Çakal, H., (2022). Sosyal Psikoloji perspektifinden kolektif eylemlere katılmanın belirleyicileri üzerine bir derleme. Nesne Dergisi, 10(24), 336- 361. Doi: 10.7816/nesne-10-24-10.

Perspectives Turkey, (2013). The green movement in Turkey. https://tr.boell.org/sites/default/files/perspectives_4._sayi_pdf_eng.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M. ve Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(6), 883. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018.

Pong, V. ve Tam, K. P. (2023). Relationship between global identity and pro-environmental behavior and environmental concern: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1033564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1033564.

Rabinovich A, Heath S. C., Zhischenko V, Mkilema F, Patrick A, Nasseri M, Wynants M, Blake W. H., Mtei K, Munishi, L. ve Ndakidemi P. (2020). Protecting the commons: predictors of willingness to mitigate communal land degradation among Maasai pastoralists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, p.101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101504.

Rees, J. H. ve Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2032.

Reese G, Hamann K R, Heidbreder L M, Loy L S, Menzel C, Neubert S, Tröger J. ve Wullenkord M. C. (2020). SARS-Cov-2 and environmental protection: A collective psychology agenda for environmental psychology research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, p.101444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101444.

Rosenmann, A., Reese, G. ve Cameron, J. E. (2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621272.

Ruiz-Dodobara, F., Villanueva Moran, A. R. ve Escurra Mayaute, L. M. (2023). Social media and collective action against climate change among Peruvian college students. Comunicación y sociedad, 20. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2023.8413

Sabherwal A, Ballew M T, van Der Linden S, Gustafson A, Goldberg M H, Maibach E W, Kotcher J E, Swim J K, Rosenthal S A ve Leiserowitz A (2021). The Greta Thunberg Effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in The United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), pp.321-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12737

Sarı, E., Yücel, E. ve Bükün, M. F. (2024). The role of emotions in collective responses to in-group norm violations: the case of university’s sensitivity to the natural environment norm. Current Psychology, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06370-1.

Schanes, K., Dobernig, K. ve Hartl, B., (2022). Preventing food waste through collective action: The Case of food sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182: 978-991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4123929

Shipley, N. J. ve van Riper, C. J. (2022). Pride and guilt predict pro-environmental behavior: A meta- analysis of correlational and experimental evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101753.

Sia, S. K. (2020). Intention to participate in Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (clean India mission) role of social identity and perceived social norm. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(4), 847-856. Doi: 10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0132.

Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W. ve Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895.

Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S. ve Wisneski, D. C. (2021). The psychology of moral conviction. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-063020-030612.

Skitka, L. J. ve Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x

Skitka, L. J. ve Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419 –1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236873.

Skov, B. C. ve Weiler, A. M. “Find a Place Where You Can Be a Part of the Change”: A Thematic Analysis of the Conditions that Influence Direct, Collective Pro-Environmental Activism. JIRIRI, 34.

Smith, H. J. ve Spears, R. (1996). Ability and outcome evaluations as a function of personal and collective (dis) advantage: A group escape from individual bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 690-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227004.

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social İssues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.

Sturmer, S. ve Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000117

Stürmer, S. ve Simon, B. (2009). Pathways to collective protest: Calculation, identification, or emotion? A critical analysis of the role of group‐based anger in social movement participation. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 681-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01620.x

Swim, J.K., Stern, P.C., Doherty, T.J., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P., Weber, E.U., Gifford, R. ve Howard, G.S., 2011. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), p.241. Doi: 10.1037/a0023220.

Tajfel, H. (1982). Experimental studies of intergroup behaviour. In Cognitive Analysis of Social Behavior: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on “The Cognitive Analysis of Socio- Psychological Processes”, Aix-enProvence, France, July 12–31, 1981 (ss. 227-246). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.

Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political Psychology (ss. 276-293). Psychology Press.

Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451. Doi: 10.1037//0033- 295X.109.3.451.

Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I. ve McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action- relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes ve Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619.

Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C. ve Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and social psychology review, 13(3), 194-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563.

Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C. ve Mavor, K. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 137-151. doi:10.1177/1368430215612217

Thomas, E. F. ve McGarty, C. A. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group‐based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X313774.

Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin.

Turner, J. C, Hogg M. A, Oakes P. J, Reicher S. D. ve Wetherell M. S, (1987). Rediscovering The Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell.

Uçar, G. K., Yalçın, M. G., Planalı, G. Ö. ve Reese, G. (2023). Social identities, climate change denial, and efficacy beliefs as predictors of pro-environmental engagements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102144.

Uysal, M. S. ve Akfırat, S. A. (2022). Formation of an emergent protestor identity: Applying the EMSICA to the Gezi Park protests. Group Processes ve Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 527-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983597.

Van Breen, J. A., Spears, R. Kuppens, T. ve de Lemus, S. (2017). A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019.

Van Lange, P. A., Higgins, E. T. ve Kruglanski, A. W. (2011). Handbook of theories of social psychology. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1-1144.

Van Zomeren, M., Kutlaca, M. ve Turner-Zwinkels, F. (2018). Integrating who “we” are with what “we”(will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W. ve Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1055- 1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006.

Van Zomeren, M., Pauls, I. L. ve Cohen-Chen, S. (2019). Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion-and problem-focused coping functions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.003.

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2012). On conviction's collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x.

Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T. ve Schellhaas, F. M. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes ve Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212467476.

Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H. ve Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.

Van Zomeren, M. ve Lodewijkx, H. F. (2005). Motivated responses to ‘senseless’ violence: Explaining emotional and behavioural responses through person and position identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(6), 755-766. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.274.

Vestergren, S., Bamberg, S. ve Louis, W. (2024). Responding to the Socio-Ecological Crisis: Activism and Collective Action. Global Environmental Psychology, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.13075.

Walker, I. ve Smith, H. J., (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge University Press.

Wallis, H. ve Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581.

Wang, X., Van der Werff, E., Bouman, T., Harder, M. K. ve Steg, L. (2021). I am vs. we are: how biospheric values and environmental identity of individuals and groups can influence pro-environmental behaviour. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 618956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956.

Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M. ve Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994.

Yazar, M., Baykal Fide, E. ve Daloğlu Çetinkaya, I. (2024). The nested hierarchy of urban vulnerability within land use policies fails to address climate injustices in Turkey. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 26(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2279059.

Yeşil Direniş, (2022). Kaz dağları hepimizin. Erişim adresi, https://www.yesildirenis.com/en/2019/08/09/iklim-aktivisti-greta-thunberg-kaz-daglari-hepimizin/ Son erişim tarihi (28/05/2022).

Zajak, S. (2022). COVID-19 and the Reconfiguration of the Social Movements Landscape. In Social Movements and Politics During COVID-19 (ss. 134-140). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2qnx5gh.21.

Zhao, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lu, J. ve He, W. (2018). Relation between awe and environmentalism: The role of social dominance orientation. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02367.