Anahtar Kelimeler
toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri
çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik
toplumsal cinsiyet kalıp yargıları
düşmanca cinsiyetçilik
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Spontane çıkarımlar, insanların niyet, farkındalık ve kontrol olmaksızın diğerlerine ilişkin izlenim oluşturma süreçlerini ifade eder. Spontane kişilik özelliği çıkarımları (SKÖÇ) ise yalnızca bir davranışın gözlenmesi suretiyle gözleyenin zihninde bir kişilik özelliğinin aktive olmasını (aktivasyon aşaması) ve davranışı gerçekleştiren aktörün temsilleri arasında uzun süreli bellekte kaydedilmesini (ilişkilendirme aşaması) içerir. Bu süreç otomatik olarak gerçekleşse de, insanların içinde bulundukları kültürün sunduğu çerçevede ve benimsedikleri kalıp yargılarla uyumlu yönde SKÖÇ yapma eğiliminde olduğunu gösteren bulgular mevcuttur. Bu çalışmanın amacı katılımcının cinsiyetinin, cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının ve cinsiyetçiliğin farklı boyutlarının SKÖÇ’ün ilişkilendirme aşaması üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaçla Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Kuramı ve Yanlış Tanıma Paradigması'ndan faydalanılmıştır. Katılımcılara çalışma aşamasında yüz fotoğrafları ve belirli bir kişilik özelliğini ima eden cümleler sunulmuştur. Test aşamasında ise ima edilen kişilik özellikleri ve yüz fotoğrafları sunularak, sunulan kişilik özelliğinin, o yüzle birlikte çalışma aşamasında sunulan cümlede yer alıp almadığına karar verme görevi verilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre düşmanca cinsiyetçilik düzeyi yüksek erkeklerde cinsiyet kalıp yargılarıyla uyumlu SKÖÇ gözlenirken, katılımcıların cinsiyetinden bağımsız olarak koruyucu ataerkilliği düşük bireylerde cinsiyet kalıp yargılarıyla uyumsuz SKÖÇ daha fazla görülmüştür. Özetle, cinsiyetçiliğin farklı alt boyutları cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının SKÖÇ üzerindeki etkilerini farklı şekilde düzenlemektedir. Sonuçlar Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Kuramı ve SKÖÇ ile kalıp yargıların ilişkileri kapsamında tartışılmıştır.
Referanslar
Aktan, T., & Yalcindag, B. (2022). Re-visiting Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI): Construct Validity of Benevolent Sexism and Measurement Invariance of ASI. Studies in Psychology, 42(1), 199-230.
Angelone. D. J., Cantor. N., Marcantonio. T., & Joppa. M. (2020). Does sexism mediate the gender and rape myth acceptance relationship? Violence against women, 1077801220913632.
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1, Basic processes (2nd ed., pp. 1–40).
Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2009). She’s emotional. He’s having a bad day: Attributional explanations for emotion stereotypes. Emotion, 9(5), 649-658.
Brown, C. S. & Stone, E. A. (2016). Gender stereotypes and discrimination: how sexism impacts development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 50, 105-133.
Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131-136.
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2007). The influence of stereotypes on decisions to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1102-1117.
Cowie, L. J., Greaves, L. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Sexuality and sexism: Differences in ambivalent sexism across gender and sexual identity. Personality and Individual Differences, 148, 85-89.
Davies, P.G., Spencer, S.J., & Steele, C.M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276-287.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991-1004.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Prsonality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18.
Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1996). The knife that cuts both ways: Facilitated and inhibited access to traits as a result of stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 271-288.
Dueñas, J. M., Santiago-Larrieu, B., Ferre-Rey, G., & Cosi, S. (2020). The Relationship Between Family Socialization Styles and Ambivalent Sexism in Adolescence. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 14(1), 28-39.
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 297-327.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 491-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 115- 188.
Gutierrez, B. C., & Leaper, C. (2023). Linking Ambivalent Sexism to Violence-Against-Women Attitudes and Behaviors: A Three-Level Meta-analytic Review. Sexuality & Culture, 1-32.
Ham, J., & Vonk, R. (2003). Smart and easy: Co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 434-447.
Jackson, S. M. (2016). The influence of implicit and explicit gender bias on grading, and the effectiveness of rubrics for reducing bias (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1529. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1529.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 489-509.
Kuchynka, S. L., Salomon, K., Bosson, J. K., El-Hout, M., Kiebel, E., Cooperman, C., & Toomey, R. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72-87.
Kunst, J. R., Bailey, A., Prendergast, C., & Gundersen, A. (2019). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #metoo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology, 22(5), 818-843.
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J. ve Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387-15392.
Mason, M. F., Cloutier, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2006). On construing others: Category and stereotype activation form facial cues. Social Cognition, 24, 540-562.
McCarthy, R. J., & Skowronski, J. J. (2011). The interplay of controlled and automatic processing in the expression of spontaneously inferred traits: A PDP analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 229-240
Na, J., & Kitayama, S. (2011). Spontaneous trait inference is culture-specific: Behavioral and neural evidence. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1025-1032.
Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M., & Kirkman, M. (2019). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80, 362-380.
Pozo-García, E. D., de la Puente Pacheco, M. A., Fernández-Cornejo, J. A., Belope-Nguema, S., Rodríguez- Juárez, E., & Escot, L. (2020). Whether your name is Manuel or María matters: gender biases in recommendations to study engineering. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-15. doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1805303.
Ramos, T., Garcia-Marques, L., Hamilton, D. L., Ferreira, M., & Van Acker, K. (2012). What I infer depends on who you are: The influence of stereotypes on trait and situational spontaneous inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1247-1256.
Renfrow. D. G.. & Howard. J. A. (2013). Social psychology of gender and race. In Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 491-531). Springer Netherlands.
Rooth. D. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real-world evidence. Labour Economics. 17. 523-534.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender. New York, NY: Guilford.
Sakalli, N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(3), 53-64.
Sakallı- Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Ambivalent sexism inventory: A study of validity and reliability]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17 (49), 47-58.
Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 296-302.
Sarlet, M., Dumont, M., Delacollette, N., & Dardenne, B. (2012). Prescription of protective paternalism for men in romantic and work contexts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 444-457.
Sen, G. & Östlin, P., (2008). Gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it. WHO Comission on Social Determinants of Health.
Shilinsky, A.N., (2016) “Does benevolence benefit? Understanding the role of benevolent sexism subfactors in predicting sexual aggression among men”. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Rowan University. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2045.
Smith, E. R. (2014). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In Handbook of social cognition (pp. 99-152). Psychology Press.
Swim, J.K., & Campbell, B. (2001). Sexism: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. In R. Brown & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup processes (pp.218237). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 406-411.
Taşdemir, N., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62(7-8), 420-426.
Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors: Evidence from false recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1051-1065.
Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors' faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549-562.
Uleman, J. S. (1987). Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(3), 337-354.
Uleman, J. S., Blader, S. L., & Todorov, A. (2005). Implicit impressions. The new unconscious, 362-392.
Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 211– 279. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60239-7.
Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., & Gonzalez, C. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329-360.
Uleman, J. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 490-501.
Van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 497-527.
Wang, M., Xia, J., & Yang, F. (2015). Flexibility of spontaneous trait inferences: The interactive effects of mood and gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 33(4), 345-358.
Wigboldus, D. H., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype-inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 470-484.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252.
Yan, X., Wang, M., & Zhang, Q. (2012). Effects of gender stereotypes on spontaneous trait inferences and the moderating role of gender schematicity: Evidence from Chinese undergraduates. Social Cognition, 30, 220-231.
Zafra. E. L., & Retamero. R. G. (2021). Are gender stereotypes changing over time?: A cross-temporal analysis of perceptions about gender stereotypes in Spain. International Journal of Social Psychology. 36(2). 330-354.
Zárate. M. A., Uleman. J. S., & Voils. C. I. (2001). Effects of culture and processing goals on the activation and binding of trait concepts. Social Cognition, 19(3). 295-323.
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi