Anahtar Kelimeler
sosyal robotik
zihin algısı
bilişsel bilim
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Son 20 yıl içinde yapay zekâ alanındaki gelişmeler, insanlarla etkileşimde bulunan ve bu etkileşimlerden öğrenen sosyal robotları insanların sosyal yaşamına dahil etmiştir. Günümüzde, çocuklara matematik ya da dil öğreten, otizmli bireylerin tedavi ve rehabilitasyonunda kullanılan ya da banka ve restoranlarda müşteriyi yönlendiren sosyal robotlar mevcuttur. İnsan hayatına hızla girmekte olan bu yeni ‘birey’lerin, insanlar tarafından nasıl algılandıkları, kabul görüp görmedikleri ise henüz yanıtı yeni aranmaya başlanan bir konudur. Bu konunun anlaşılmasının iki önemli nedeni vardır: Birincisi, gelecekte hayatımızın önemli alanlarında yer alacak robotları üreten mühendislere, sosyal bilimler perspektifinden geri bildirimler vermektir. İkincisi ise insanı insan yapan ve onu kendine benzeyen diğer varlıklardan ayıran özelliklerin anlaşılmasıdır. Bu amaçlarla, insan-robot etkileşimi ve bilişsel bilimler kesişiminde yapılan disiplinler arası çalışmaların ana araştırma sorularından biri insanların robotlara zihinsel kapasiteler atfedip atfetmedikleridir. Bu derleme makalede, bilişsel bilimlerdeki zihin atfetme kavramı ele alınacak ve robotlara dair zihin atfetmeyi inceleyen çalışmaların kapsamlı bir değerlendirilmesi yapılacaktır. Ek olarak, robotlara dair zihin atfetmede kullanılan yöntemlerin ve zihin atfetmeyi etkileyen faktörlerin üzerinde durulacaktır. Böylece bilişsel bilimler ve insan-robot etkileşimi alanında gelecekte yapılacak disiplinler arası çalışmalara ışık tutulması beklenmektedir.
Referanslar
Alimardani, M. ve Qurashi, S. (2020). Mind perception of a sociable humanoid robot: a comparison between elderly and young adults. In Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference: Advances in Robotics, Volume 2 (96-108). Springer International Publishing.
Armstrong, M. E. ve Jones, K. S. (2018, March). Individual Differences Predict Anthropomorphism of Robots along One of Two Dimensions. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (53-54).
Bernotat, J. ve Eyssel, F. (2018, August). Can (‘t) Wait to Have a Robot at Home?-Japanese and German Users' Attitudes Toward Service Robots in Smart Homes. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (15-22). IEEE.
Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual review of psychology, 68, 627-652.
Butler, R., Pruitt, Z. ve Wiese, E. (2019, November). The effect of social context on the mind perception of robots. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, No. 1, 230-234). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Cheetham, M., Pavlovic, I., Jordan, N., Suter, P. ve Jancke, L. (2013). Category processing and the human likeness dimension of the uncanny valley hypothesis: eye-tracking data. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 108.
Cross, E. S., Hortensius, R. ve Wykowska, A. (2019). From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374(1771), 20180024.
Cucciniello, I., Sangiovanni, S., Maggi, G. ve Rossi, S. (2023). Mind perception in HRI: Exploring users’ attribution of mental and emotional states to robots with different behavioural styles. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(5), 867-877.
Cullen, H., Kanai, R., Bahrami, B. ve Rees, G. (2014). Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1276- 1280.
Diel, A. ve MacDorman, K. F. (2021). Creepy cats and strange high houses: Support for configural processing in testing predictions of nine uncanny valley theories. Journal of Vision, 21(4), 1-1.
Dreyfus, H. (1972). What Computers Can't Do. New York: MIT Press.
Gray, H. M., Gray, K. ve Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. science, 315(5812), 619- 619.
Gray, K. ve Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125-130.
Hackel, L. M., Looser, C. E. ve Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 15-23.
Ishiguro, H. (2007). Android science: Toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. In Robotics research: results of the 12th International Symposium ISRR (118-127). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Jacobs, O. L., Gazzaz, K. ve Kingstone, A. (2022). Mind the robot! Variation in attributions of mind to a wide set of real and fictional robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 529-537.
Krumhuber, E. G., Swiderska, A., Tsankova, E., Kamble, S. V. ve Kappas, A. (2015). Real or artificial? Intergroup biases in mind perception in a cross-cultural perspective. PLoS One, 10(9), e0137840.
Lefkeli, D., Ozbay, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z. ve Eskenazi, T. (2021). Competing with or against cozmo, the robot: Influence of interaction context and outcome on mind perception. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 715-724.
Li, Z., Terfurth, L., Woller, J. P. ve Wiese, E. (2022, March). Mind the machines: applying implicit measures of mind perception to social robotics. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (236-245). IEEE.
MacDorman, K. F. ve Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 297-337.
MacDorman, K. F. ve Entezari, S. O. (2015). Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interaction Studies, 16(2), 141-172.
MacDorman, K. F. ve Chattopadhyay, D. (2016). Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Cognition, 146, 190-205.
Malle, B. (2019, July). How many dimensions of mind perception really are there?. In CogSci (2268-2274).
Matsuda, Y. T., Okamoto, Y., Ida, M., Okanoya, K. ve Myowa-Yamakoshi, M. (2012). Infants prefer the faces of strangers or mothers to morphed faces: an uncanny valley between social novelty and familiarity. Biology letters, 8(5), 725-728.
Minsky, M. L. (1982). Why people think computers can't. AI magazine, 3(4), 3-3.
Minsky, M. (2006). The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
Mori, M. 1970. “The uncanny valley”. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
Pekçetin, T. N., Barinal, B., Tunç, J., Acarturk, C. ve Urgen, B. A. (2023, March). Studying mind perception in social robotics implicitly: The need for validation and norming. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (202-210).
Pinker, S. (2009). How the Mind Works. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Piwek, L., McKay, L. S. ve Pollick, F. E. (2014). Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition, 130(3), 271-277.
Poliakoff, E., Beach, N., Best, R., Howard, T. ve Gowen, E. (2013). Can looking at a hand make your skin crawl? Peering into the uncanny valley for hands. Perception, 42(9), 998-1000.
Saltik, I., Erdil, D. ve Urgen, B. A. (2021, March). Mind Perception and Social Robots: The Role of Agent Appearance and Action Types. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (210-214).
Saygin, A. P., Thierry, C., Urgen, B. A. ve Ishiguro, H. (2011, July). Cognitive neuroscience and robotics: a mutually beneficial joining of forces. In Robotics: science and systems (RSS).
Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J. ve Frith, C. (2012). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 7(4), 413-422.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences, 3(3), 417-424.
Sharkey, A. ve Sharkey, N. (2011). Children, the elderly, and interactive robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(1), 32-38.
Shen, J. ve Koyama, S. (2022, October). Gender and age differences in mind perception of robots. In 2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE) (pp. 748-751). IEEE.
Short, E. S., Swift-Spong, K., Shim, H., Wisniewski, K. M., Zak, D. K., Wu, S., ... ve Matarić, M. J. (2017, August). Understanding social interactions with socially assistive robotics in intergenerational family groups. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (236-241). IEEE.
Sinnema, L. ve Alimardani, M. (2019). The attitude of elderly and young adults towards a humanoid robot as a facilitator for social interaction. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26–29, 2019, Proceedings 11 (24-33). Springer International Publishing.
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D. M. ve Broadbent, E. (2014). Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. International journal of social robotics, 6, 17-32.
Thompson, J. C., Trafton, J. G. ve McKnight, P. (2011). The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents. Perception, 40(6), 695-704.
Turing, A. (1950). Turing. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-60.
Urgen, B. A., Kutas, M. ve Saygin, A. P. (2018). Uncanny valley as a window into predictive processing in the social brain. Neuropsychologia, 114, 181-185.
Wallkötter, S., Stower, R., Kappas, A. ve Castellano, G. (2020, March). A robot by any other frame: framing and behaviour influence mind perception in virtual but not real-world environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (609-618).
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. ve Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219-232.
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N. ve Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(8), 383-388.
Weisman, K., Dweck, C. S. ve Markman, E. M. (2017). Rethinking people’s conceptions of mental life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(43), 11374-11379.
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi