Ahlaki Temellerin Ötesinde: Ne Varsa Onda Var
Cilt 11 Sayı 29 kapak
PDF

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ahlak
ahlaki temeller
sıradan insanların ahlak algısı
özgürlük
hiyerarşi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Ahlaki Temellerin Ötesinde: Ne Varsa Onda Var. (2023). Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 11(29), 366-391. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-11-29-03

Öz

Ahlak kavramının içeriği nedir? Bu soru yıllar boyu psikoloji literatüründe kısmen dar bir bakış açısı ile zarar vermemek ve adil olmak şeklinde yanıtlanmıştır. Geçtiğimiz 30 yılda yapılan araştırmalarla ahlak anlayışı oldukça genişlemiştir. Farklı alanlardaki ilerlemeler ahlaka daha kapsamlı bir bakış açısı getirilmesini sağlamıştır; özellikle ahlaki temeller kuramı (ATK), sadakat, otorite ve kutsallık gibi başka ahlaki ilkelerin de varlığını iddia etmiştir. Mevcut araştırma, iki niteliksel çalışmayla sıradan insanların ahlak anlayışını araştırmıştır. İlk çalışmada, ATK’nin ahlaki temel tanımlarını kullanarak katılımcılar tarafından nasıl algılandıklarını anlamayı amaçladık. İkinci çalışmada ise daha yapısal olmayan bir yol kullanarak ahlakı, ahlaklı insanı ve ahlaksız insanı nasıl tanımladıklarını anlamaya çalıştık. Bulgular çoğulcu ahlaki bakış açısını doğrulamıştır. Bununla beraber, ahlaki temellerde daha net işevuruk tanımların gereği ve çeşitli değişiklik önerileri dile getirilmiştir. Sonradan eklenen bir ahlaki kavram olan özgürlük, daha geniş yönleriyle birlikte ahlaki bir temel olarak da desteklenmiştir. Sonuçlar ATK’nin bakış açısını bireysel, toplumsal ve evrensel düzeydeki ahlaki ilkelerle genişletmekte ve ahlaki duygular, erdemler ve kötülükler gibi yeni araştırma alanları sunmaktadır.

PDF

Referanslar

Aristotle (2009). The nicomachean ethics. (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press, Inc.

Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000470

Birge, J. K. (1965). The bektashi order of dervishes. Luzac & Co, Ltd.

Carnes, N. C., Allmon, B., Alva, J., Cousar, K. A., & Varnam, Z. D. (2022). How morality signals, benefits, binds, and teaches. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101, 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104313

Carnes, N., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2012). Harm, help, and the nature of (im)moral (in)action. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.667768

Challenges (2009, August). Moral Foundations.org. Retrieved from, http://moralfoundations.org/challenges.

Damasio, A. R. (2006). Descartes’in yanılgısı: Duygu, akıl ve insan beyni. (B. Atlamaz Çev.) [Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain]. Varlık Yayınları. (Original work published 1994).

Fiske, A. P. (1991). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689

Frimer, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Schaefer, N. K. (2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214538672

Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481-517. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s developments. Harvard University Press.

Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. (pp. 11-31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-001

Graham, J., & Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4

Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

Gray, K., DiMaggio, N., Schein, C., & Kachanoff, F. (2023). The problem of purity in moral psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 272-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221124741

Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Dimensions of moral emotions. Emotion Review, 3(3), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402388

Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2109. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1062872

Guerra, V. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). The community, autonomy, and divinity scale (CADS): A new tool for the cross-cultural study of morality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109348919

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford University Press.

Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651

Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Boks.

Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). MIT Press.

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 6, 98-116.

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027945

Hadit, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology, (5th Ed.) (pp. 797-832). Wiley.

Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021). Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1303-1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12452

Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., & Zettler, I. (2015). Truth will out: Linking personality, morality, and honesty through indirect questioning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614553640

Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345, 1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560

Iyer, R. (2010). The case for honesty as a moral foundation. http://www.polipsych.com/ 2010/12/07/the-case- for-honesty-as-a-moral-foundation/ Retrieved on June 26, 2012.

Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J. Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016). Social justice and social order: Binding moralities across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 11(3), Article e0152479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152479

Kolhberg, L. (1973). The claim of moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral development. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025030

Küçükyalçın, E. (2013). Turna’nın kalbi: Yeniçeri yoldaşlığı ve bektaşilik. [Crane’s heart: The janissary comradeship and bektashizm](4th ed.). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

Meindl, P., Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2019). Distributive justice beliefs are guided by whether people think the ultimate goal of society is well-being or power. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41, 359-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1663524

Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231

Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The moral foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049

Power, F. C., Higgins, A., & Kolhberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg’s approach to moral education. Columbia University Press.

Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867

Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574

Russell, P. S., Piazza, J., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). CAD revisited: Effects of the word moral on the moral relevance of disgust (and other emotions). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612442913

Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm- based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591501

Shweder, R. A. (1990). In defense of moral realism: Reply to Gabennesch. Child Development, 61, 2060- 2067. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130859

Shweder, R. A., & Haidt, J. (1993). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4, 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00582.x

Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M, & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and Health (pp. 119-169). Routledge.

Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895

Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2021). The psychology of moral conviction. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-063020-030612

Skurka, C., Winett, L. B., Jarman-Miller, H., & Niederdeppe, J. (2020). All things being equal: Distinguishing proportionality and equity in moral reasoning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 374-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619862261

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.

Turiel, E. (2017). A psychological perspective on moral reasoning, processes of decision-making, and moral resistance. Contemporary Politics, 23(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1213079

Yalçındağ, B., Özkan, T., Cesur S., Tepe, B., Piyale, E. Z., Biten, A., F., Yılmaz, O., & Sunar, D. (2019). An investigation of moral foundations theory in Turkey using different measures. Current Psychology, 38 (2), 440-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4

Zajonc, R. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151- 175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151

Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021). Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. PloS one, 16(10), e0258910. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0258910

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Telif Hakkı (c) 2023 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi