SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN KOLEKTİF EYLEMLERE KATILMANIN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DERLEME

Acar, Y. G. (2018). Gezi’den sonra ne oldu? Güçlenmenin, politikleşmenin ve örgütlenmenin kolektif eylemlerdeki rolü [What happened after Gezi? The role of empowerment, politicization, and organizing in collective action]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21, 62-78.

Ackermann, K. ve Gundelach, B. (2020). Psychological roots of political consumerism: Personality traits and participation in boycott and buycott. International Political Science Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120959683

Adra, A., Harb, C., Li, M. ve Baumert, A. (2020). Predicting collective action tendencies among Filipina domestic workers in Lebanon: Integrating the Social Identity Model of Collective Action and the role of fear. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 967-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885180

Akkuş, B., Postmes, T., Stroebe, K. ve Baray, G. (2020). Cultures of conflict: Protests, violent repression, and community values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12328

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley

Ayanian, A. H., Tausch, N., Acar, Y. G., Chayinska, M., Cheung, W. Y. ve Lukyanova, Y. (2021). Resistance in repressive contexts: A comprehensive test of psychological predictors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 912. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000285

Bağcı, S. C., Stathi, S. ve Piyale, Z. E. (2019). When imagining intergroup contact mobilizes collective action: The perspective of disadvantaged and advantaged groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 69, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.12.003

Begeny, C. T., van Breen, J., Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M. ve Iyer, A. (2022). The power of the ingroup for promoting collective action: How distinctive treatment from fellow minority members motivates collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101, 104346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104346

Bamberg, S., Rees, J. ve Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155- 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Becker, J. C. ve Tausch, N. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265

Becker, J.C., Wright, S.C., Lubensky, M.E. ve Zhou, S. (2013). Friend or Ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 442- 455. doi: 10.1177/0146167213477155

Bou Zeineddine, F. ve Leach, C. W. (2021). Feeling and thought in collective action on social issues: Toward a systems perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12622

Breuer, J. ve Freud, S. (1955). Studies on hysteria (Standard ed., Vol. II). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1893-1895)

Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289002

Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F. ve Stack, A. D. (1999). Catharsis, aggression, and persuasive influence: Self-fulfilling or self-defeating prophecies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 367- 376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.367

Cheung, W. Y., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Tausch, N. ve Ayanian, A. H. (2017). Collective nostalgia is associated with stronger outgroup-directed anger and participation in ingroup-favoring collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.697

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A. ve Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). Academic Press.

Cohen-Chen, S., Halperin, E., Crisp, R. J. ve Gross, J. J. (2014). Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5,67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613484499

Cohen-Chen, S. ve Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016

Çakal, H., Eller, A., Sirlopú, D. ve Pérez, A. (2016b). Intergroup relations in Latin America: Intergroup contact, common ingroup identity, and activism among indigenous groups in Mexico and Chile. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12170

Çakal, H., Halabi, S., Cazan, A. M. ve Eller, A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885163

Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Güler, M. ve Heath, A. (2016a). Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity. Group Processes ve Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 732-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303

Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Schwaer, G. ve Heath, A. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact amongst Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044– 8309.2011.02075.x

Demirdağ, A. ve Hasta, D. (2019). Threat perception and perspective taking as mediators between competitive victimhood and evaluations of collective action: The Gezi Park protests. Political Psychology, 40(5), 953-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12564

De Weerd, M. ve Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and political protest: Farmers` protests in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1073::AID-EJSP986>3.0.CO;2-K

Dixon, J., Cakal, H., Khan, W., Osmany, M., Majumdar, S. ve Hassan, M. (2017). Contact, political solidarity and collective action: An Indian case study of relations between historically disadvantaged communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2296

Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Thomae, M., Tredoux, C., Kerr, P. ve Quayle, M. (2015). Divide and rule, unite and resist: Contact, collective action and policy attitudes among historically disadvantaged groups. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 576-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12129

Dixon, J.A., Durrheim, K. ve Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x

Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S. ve Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411– 425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214

Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K. ve Tredoux, C. G. (2010) “Let them eat harmony”: Prejudice reduction and the political attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19:76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410363366

Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. ve Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross‐group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168

Drury, J. ve Reicher, S. D. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642

Drury, J. ve Reicher, S. D. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231

Eidelson, R. J. (1997). Complex adaptive systems in the behavioral and social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 1, 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089‐2680.1.1.42

Elgin, V. M. ve Mamatoğlu, N. (2014). Gezi Parkı olayları: namus kültürü ve çatışma çözüm tarzları açısından bir değerlendirme. Alternative Politics/Alternatif Politika, 6(1).

Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stoebe ve M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Ellemers, N. (2013). Connecting the dots: Mobilizing theory to reveal the big picture in social psychology (and why we should do this). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1932

Eraslan, E. G. ve Çakal, H. (2022). Dynamic Norms Can Encourage Attitudinal Change: Normative and Counternormative Political Attitudes [Yayınlanmak üzere gönderilen yazı]. School of Psychology, Keele University.

Fingerhut, A. W. (2011). Straight allies: What predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2230– 2248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00807.x

Fischer, A. H. ve Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103

Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris ve C. M. Muller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W. ve Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.5465/255979

Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., Gasper, K., Fraser, J. ve Flinner, K. (2021). How do I feel when I think about taking action? Hope and boredom, not anxiety and helplessness, predict intentions to take climate action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101649

Gezici-Yalçın, M. ve Uluğ, Ö. M. (2017). “Gezi, bardağı taşıran son damlaydı”: Sosyal psikolojik bir perspektifle Gezi Parkı isyanını anlamak (“Gezi was the last drop”: Understanding the Gezi Park protests from a social psychological perspective). Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20 (Special Issue), 96–109.

Górska, P., Stefaniak, A., Marchlewska, M., Matera, J., Kocyba, P., Łukianow, M., Malinowska, K. ve Lipowska, K. (2022). Refugees unwelcome: Narcissistic and secure national commitment differentially predict collective action against immigrants and refugees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 86, 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.11.009

Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E. ve Hom, H. (2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02071.x

Halperin, E. (2013). Emotion, emotion regulation, and conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 6, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913491844

Hässler, T., Ullrich, J., Bernadino, M., Shnabel, N., van Laar, C., Valdenegro, D., Sebben, S., Tropp, L. R., Visintin, E. P., González, R., Ditlmann, R. K., Abrams, D., Selvanathan, H. P., Branković, M., Wright, S., von Zimmermann, J., Pasek, M., Aydin, A. L., Žeželj, I., . . . Ugarte, L. M. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. ve Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

Hornberger, R. H. (1959). The differential reduction of aggressive responses as a function of interpolated activities. American Psychologist, 14, 354.

Iyer, A., Schmader, T. ve Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 572- 587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297402

Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D. ve Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633

Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417

Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

Kutlaca, M., Radke, H.R.M. ve Becker, J.C. (2022), The Impact of Including Advantaged Groups in Collective Action Against Social Inequality on Politicized Identification of Observers From Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups. Political Psychology, 43: 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12755

Louis, W.R. (2009), Collective Action—and Then What?. Journal of Social Issues, 65: 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.x

Louis, W., Thomas, E., McGarty, C., Lizzio‐Wilson, M., Amiot, C. ve Moghaddam, F. (2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Political Psychology, 41, 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12671

Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. ve Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602

Mazzoni, D., van Zomeren, M. ve Cicognani, E. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian water movement. Political Psychology, 36(3), 315- 330. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12101

Miller, D. A., Cronin, T., Garcia, A. L. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2009). The relative impact of anger and efficacy on collective action is affected by feelings of fear. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209105046

Morselli, D., Passini, S. ve McGarty, C. (2021). Sos Venezuela: an analysis of the anti-Maduro protest movements using Twitter. Social Movement Studies, 20(5), 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1770072

Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A. ve Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229

Nelson, J. A., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Hurt, M. M., Ramsey, L. R., Turner, D. L. ve Haines, M. E. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58(9), 721-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0

Nowak, A. ve Vallacher, R. R. (2019). Nonlinear societal change: The perspective of dynamical systems. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12271

Odağ, Ö., Uluğ, Ö.M., Kanık, B. ve Maganić, M. M. (2022), Exploring the Context-Sensitivity of Collective Action Motivations and the Mobilizing Role of Social Media: A Comparative Interview Study With Activists in Germany and Turkey. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12836

Odağ, Ö., Uluğ, Ö. M. ve Solak, N. (2016). “Everyday I am çapuling”: Identity and collective action through social network sites in the Gezi Park protests in Turkey. Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 148–159. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000202

Olson, M. (1968). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Özkan, Z., Dhont, K. ve Abrams., D. (2022). Intergroup Contact and Solidarity-based Collective Action: The Role of Affective and Identity-based Processes. [Yayınlanmak üzere gönderilen yazı]. School of Psychology, University of Kent.

Özkan, Z., Ergün, N. ve Çakal, H. (2021). Positive versus negative contact and refugees' intentions to migrate: The mediating role of perceived discrimination, life satisfaction and identification with the host society among Syrian refugees in Turkey. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 438-451. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2508

Pauls, I. L., Shuman, E., van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T. ve Halperin, E. (2022). Does crossing a moral line justify collective means? Explaining how a perceived moral violation triggers normative and nonnormative forms of collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 105– 123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2818

Pettigrew, T. F. ve Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Pettigrew, T. F. ve Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Radke, H. R., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S. C. ve Becker, J. C. (2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320918698

Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Paul’s riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140102

Reicher, S. D. (1996). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317–337). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann

Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Neji, S., Rychlowska, M., Schmid, K. ve Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478

Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth- century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R. ve Cheung, W. Y. (2015). Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso. 12095

Sabucedo, J. M., Dono, M., Alzate, M. ve Seoane, G. (2018). The importance of protesters’ morals: Moral obligation as a key variable to understand collective action. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418

Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F. ve Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20(1), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x

Selvanathan, H. P., Techakesari, P., Tropp, L. R. ve Barlow, F. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 893-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690908

Sengupta, N.K. ve Sibley, C.G. (2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1391– 1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497593

Shepherd, L., Fasoli, F., Pereira, A. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2346

Simon, B. ve Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social-psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319

Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C. ve Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646

Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.

Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W. ve Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895

Sloot, D., Kutlaca, M., Medugorac, V. ve Carman, P. (2018). Recycling alone or protesting together? Values as a basis for pro-environmental social change actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01229

Smith, C. A. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609–637). New York, NY: Guilford

Smith, J. R. ve Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 647- 666. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X269748

Smith, H. J. ve Ortiz, D. J. (2002). Is it just me?: The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker ve H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91–115). Cambridge University Press

Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M. ve Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta- analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825

Smith, H. J. ve Spears, R. (1996). Ability and outcome evaluations as a function of personal and collective (dis)advantage: A group escape from individual bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227004

Smith, H. J., Spears, R. ve Oyen, M. (1994). “People like us”: The influence of personal deprivation and group membership salience on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(3), 277– 299. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1013

Sparkman, G. ve Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950

Spears, R., Jetten, J. ve Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of in-group bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. Jost ve B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332–362). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stefaniak, A., Mallett, R. K. ve Wohl, M. J. (2020). Zero‐sum beliefs shape advantaged allies’ support for collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1259-1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2674

Stephan, W. G. ve Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Stewart, A. L., Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., Çelik, A. B. ve Cidam, A. (2019). Explaining different orientations to the 2013 Gezi Park demonstrations in Istanbul, Turkey. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 829-852. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12316

Stewart, A. L., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Sweetman, J., Eicher, V., Licata, L., Morselli, D., Saab, R., Aiello, A., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cidam, A., Foels, R., Giguère, B., Liu, L. I., Prati, F. ve van Stekelenburg, J. (2015). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathetic collective action using theories of social dominance and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 6– 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558310

Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A. ve Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Vol. 1. Adjustment during army life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stürmer, S. ve Simon, B. (2004a). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. In W. Stroebe, &M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59–99). Hove, UK: Psychology Press

Stürmer, S. ve Simon, B. (2004b). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690

Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J. ve Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self- categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330-352. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1088868308323223

Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of intergroup differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77–100). London: Academic Press.

Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Tausch, N. ve Becker, J. C. (2013). Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: A longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02109.x

Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P. ve Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728

Tausch, N., Saguy, T. ve Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change?: Examining collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of disadvantaged groups. Journal of Social Issue, 71(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12127

Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.451

Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I. ve McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi. org/10.1177/1368430211413619

Tropp, L. R., Hawi, D. R., Van Laar, C. ve Levin, S. (2012). Cross‐ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02050.x

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. ve Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.

Ufkes, E. G., Calcagno, J., Glasford, D. E. ve Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Understanding how common ingroup identity undermines collective action among disadvantaged-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.006

Uluğ, Ö. M. ve Acar, Y. G. (2019). ‘Names will never hurt us’: A qualitative exploration of çapulcu identity through the eyes of Gezi Park protesters. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 714-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12305

Uluğ, Ö. M., Chayinska, M. ve Tropp, L. R. (2022). Conceptual, methodological, and contextual challenges in studying collective action: Recommendations for future research. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.2

Uysal, M. S. ve Akfırat, S. A. (2021a). Formation of an emergent protester identity: Applying the EMSICA to the Gezi Park protests. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983597

Uysal, M. S. ve Akfırat, S. A. (2021b). The social identity perspective of social media leadership in collective action participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2502

van Breen, J. A., Spears, R., Kuppens, T. ve de Lemus, S. (2017). A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019

Van Stekelenburg, J. ve Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61(5- 6), 886-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479314

Van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031

Van Zomeren, M. (2016). Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Political Psychology, 37, 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12322

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2012). On conviction's collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R. ve Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210395637

Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H. ve Leach, C. W. (2004). Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.

Vázquez, A., López-Rodríguez, L., Gómez, Á. ve Brambilla, M. (2022). Verification of ingroup morality promotes willingness to participate in collective action for immigrants’ rights. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220963820

Vilas, X. ve Sabucedo, J. M. (2012). Moral obligation: A forgotten dimension in the analysis of collective action. Revista de Psicología Social, 27(3), 369-375. ttps://doi.org/10.1174/021347412802845577

Webb, T. L. ve Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta- analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249

Wright, S.C. ve Lubensky, M. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J.P. Leyens, ve J.F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Wright, C. S., Taylor, M. D. ve Moghaddam, M. F. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (6), 994. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.994

Yitmen, Ş. ve Verkuyten, M. (2020). Support to Syrian refugees in Turkey: The roles of descriptive and injunctive norms, threat, and negative emotions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12400

Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A. ve Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring I am a feminist matters: labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3.