KURGU SEVİYESİ KURAMI PERSPEKTİFİNDEN SOSYAL UZAKLIĞIN ETKİSİ: ÖZ-ŞEFKATİN ROLÜ
Cilt 10 Sayı 23 kapak
PDF

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı
öz-şefkat
sosyal uzaklık
soyutlama

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KURGU SEVİYESİ KURAMI PERSPEKTİFİNDEN SOSYAL UZAKLIĞIN ETKİSİ: ÖZ-ŞEFKATİN ROLÜ. (2022). Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 10(23), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-23-01

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kurgu Seviyesi Kuramı (KSK) çerçevesinde, öz-şefkatin sosyal olarak uzak veya yakın olayları kurgulama üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Öz-şefkat puanları arttıkça, kendileri için seçim yapan kişilerin düşük seviye özelliklere, bir başkası için öneride bulunan kişilerin ise yüksek seviye özelliklere verdiği önemin azalacağı hipotezi öne sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Öz-Şefkat Ölçeği, Davranış Tanımlama Formu, ödev partneri seçme görevi kullanılmıştır. Seçkisiz olarak iki koşuldan birine atanan katılımcılardan ya kendileri için bir ödev partneri seçmeleri ya da diğer bir kişi için bir ödev partneri önermeleri istenmiştir. Ayrıca olası iki partnerin bazı özelliklerinin öneminin değerlendirilmesi de istenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini toplam 187 öğrenci (107 kadın, 80 erkek; Ortyaş =22.37, Syaş= 3.10) oluşturmaktadır. Karma varyans analizi sosyal uzaklığın kurgu seviyesi üzerindeki etkisinin beklenmeyen yönde olduğunu göstermektedir. Daha açık bir şekilde, bireylerin kendileri için ödev partneri seçtiği koşulda, yüksek seviye özelliğin öneminin, düşük seviye özelliğin önemine kıyasla, anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Ancak, bir başkası için öneride bulunma koşulunda anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışma genel olarak KSK'nin önermelerine destek sağlayamamıştır. Bootstrap analizi, öz-şefkat ve sosyal uzaklığın düşük seviye özelliğin önemi üzerindeki etkileşim etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, regresyon analizi, öz-şefkat ile kişilik özelliği kurgu seviyesi arasındaki ilişkiyi göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın öz-şefkat ile kurgu seviyesi arasındaki ilişkiye ilişkin ön bulgu sunduğu tartışılabilir.

PDF

Referanslar

Amani, R. ve Khosroshahi, A. S. (2020). The structural model of marital quality based on secure attachment style through the mediating role of self-compassion, resilience, and perspective-taking. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1813653

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. ve Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610

Biber, D. D. ve Ellis, R. (2019). The effect of self-compassion on the self-regulation of health behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(14), 2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317713361

Breines, J. G. ve Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9) 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445599

Bruk, A., Scholl, S. G. ve Bless, H. (2018). Beautiful mess effect: Self–other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000120

Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D. ve Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964

Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D. ve Wakslak, C. J. (2013). How do we want others to decide? Geographical distance influences evaluations of decision makers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 826–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481247.

Calderon, S., Mac Giolla, E., Ask, K. ve Granhag, P. A. (2020). Subjective likelihood and the construal level of future events: A replication study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 119(5), e27–e37. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000214

Chan, E. Y. ve Wang, Y. (2019). Mindfulness changes construal level: An experimental investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 48(9), 1656–1664. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000654

Chung, M. S. (2016). Relation between lack of forgiveness and depression: The moderating effect of self- compassion. Psychological Reports, 119(3), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116663520

Danziger, S., Montal, R. ve Barkan, R. (2012). Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: A psychological distance account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027013.

Darwent, K. M. (2012). Individual differences in travel across psychological distances [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. The Ohio State University

Eyal, T., Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012

Ferreira, C., Matos, M., Duarte, C. ve Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2014). Shame memories and eating psychopathology: The buffering effect of self‐compassion. European Eating Disorders Review, 22(6), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2322

Freitas, A., Salovey, P. ve Liberman, N. (2001). Abstract and concrete self- evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.80.3.410

Fresnics, A. ve Borders, A. (2017). Angry rumination mediates the unique associations between self- compassion and anger and aggression. Mindfulness, 8(3), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0629-2

Fuochi, G., Veneziani, C. A. ve Voci, A. (2018). Exploring the social side of self-compassion: Relations with empathy and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2378

Gong, H. ve Medin, D. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), 628–638.

Grossmann, I. ve Kross, E. (2010). The impact of culture on adaptive versus maladaptive self- reflection. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1150-1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376655

Grossmann, I. ve Kross, E. (2014). Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2. baskı). Guilford Press.

Henderson, M. D. ve Trope, Y. (2009). The effects of abstraction on integrative agreements: When seeing the forest helps avoid getting tangled in the trees. Social Cognition, 27(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.402

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values (2. baskı). Sage Publication Inc.

Kantaş, Ö. (2013). Impact of relational and individuational self orientations on the well-being of academicians: The roles of ego- or eco-system motivations, self-transcendence, self- compassion and burnout [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Kivetz, Y. ve Tyler, T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,102(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.002

Kogut, T., Eyal, T. ve Sharon, I. (2017). Seeing into the future: Future time orientation as a moderator of temporal distance effects on educators' decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 889– 898. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2015

Kross, E. (2009). When self becomes other. Towards an integrative understanding of the processes distinguishing adaptive self-reflection from rumination. S. Altran, A. Navarro, K. Ochsner, A. Tobeña ve O.Vilarroya (Ed.), Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers (s. 35–40) içinde. New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04545.x

Kross, E. ve Ayduk, O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, s. 81–136) içinde. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002

Kross, E., Ayduk, O. ve Mischel, W. (2005). When asking "why" does not hurt: distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x

Lathren, C. R., Rao, S. S., Park, J. ve Bluth, K. (2021). Self-compassion and current close interpersonal relationships: A scoping literature review. Mindfulness, 12(5), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01566-5

Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5

Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958

Liberman, N. ve Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001

Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D. ve Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8

Liberman, N., Trope, Y. ve Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. A. W. Kruglanski ve E. T. Higgins (Ed.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (s. 353- 383) içinde. The Guilford Press.

Liviatan, I., Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007

Lu, J. ve Xie, X. (2019). Self–other differences in change predictions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/0.1002/cb.1770

Lu, J., Xie, X. ve Xu, J. (2013). Desirability or feasibility: Self—Other decision-making differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212470146

MacBeth, A. ve Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self- compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003

Messervey, D. L. (2008). Time and time again: Cultural differences in construal levels [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Queen’s University.

Miyagawa, Y. ve Taniguchi, J. (2020). Self-compassion and time perception of past negative events. Mindfulness, 11, 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01293-6

Neff, K. D (b.t.). Self-compassion. https://self-compassion.org/

Neff, K. D. (2003a). The development and validation of a scale to measure self- compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027

Neff, K. D. (2003b). Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032

Neff, K. D. (2016). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self- compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3

Neff, K. D. ve Dahm, K. A. (2015). Self-compassion: What it is, what it does, and how it relates to mindfulness. M. Robinson, B. Meier ve B. Ostafin (Ed.), Mindfulness and self-regulation (s. 121-137) içinde. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939- 2263-5_10

Neff, K. D. ve Pommier, E. (2013). The relationship between self-compassion and other- focused concern among college undergraduates, community adults, and practicing meditators. Self and Identity, 12(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.649546

Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L. ve Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004

Neff, K. D., Pisitsungkagarn, K. ve Hsieh, Y. (2008). Self-compassion and self- construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108314544

Polman, E. (2012). Self–other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.005

Polman, E. ve Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398362

Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D. ve Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self‐ compassion scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702

Rim, S. Y. ve Summervile, A. (2014). How far to the road not taken? The effect of psychological distance on counterfactual direction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213513304

Smith, P. K. ve Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578

Soderberg, C. K., Callahan, S. P., Kochersberger, A. O., Amit, E. ve Ledgerwood, A. (2015). The effect of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta- analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000005

Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.

Trope, Y. ve Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

Updegraff, J. A. ve Suh, E. M. (2007). Happiness is a warm abstract thought: Self-construal abstractness and subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(1), 18–28. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/17439760601069150

Vallacher, R. R. ve Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671.

Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N. ve Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 641–653.

Wenzel, M. ve Coughlin, A. M. (2020). Toward the bigger picture: Concrete and abstract thinking about a transgression, and the role of time in interpersonal forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2676

Wong, V. C. ve Wyer, R. S. (2016). Mental traveling along psychological distances: The effects of cultural syndromes, perspective flexibility, and construal level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000048

Yarnell, L. M. ve Neff, K. D. (2013). Self-compassion, interpersonal conflict resolutions, and well-being. Self and Identity, 12(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.649545

Yetişer, B. (2014). Do all roads lead to rome? The moderating role of culture and age in predicting construal level on machiavellianism. Journal of Yasar University, 9(36) 6261–6380.

Zeng, T. (2019). Construal level and well-being: The role of psychological needs satisfaction [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Zessin, U., Dickhäuser, O. ve Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self- compassion and well‐ being: A meta‐ analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 7(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12051

Žeželj, I. L. ve Jokić, B. R. (2014). Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment. Social Psychology. 45, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000188

Zhang, J. W. ve Chen, S. (2016). Self-compassion promotes personal improvement from regret experiences via acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215623271

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Telif Hakkı (c) 2022 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi