Anahtar Kelimeler
Narsisizm
Duyarsızlık
Olumlu Sosyal Davranışlar
Ergenler
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Makyavelizm kendini içtensizlik, duyarsızlık ve hilekarlıkla belli eden bir kişilik özelliğidir. Uzunca bir süre psikopatoloji literatürü kapsamında incelenen Makyavelizm günümüzde özellikle yarışmacı ve aşırı bireyci sistemler içinde sıradan insanların sahip olduğu ya da sahip olması beklenen bir özellik de olabilmektedir. Bu nedenle Makyavelizm’in normal popülasyonlar içinde de incelenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı da Ergenler için Makyavelizm Ölçeği’nin (Kiddie Mach ve ark., 1970) geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin Türkçe konuşan bir örneklemde sınanmasıdır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 471 (242 kız, 225 erkek, 4 belirtilmemiş) ergen oluşturmaktadır. Örneklemin yaş dağılımı 15-17 arasında değişmektedir (Ort. = 16.7, S = .61). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri örneklemimizde Makyavelizm Ölçeği’nin iki faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini sınamak için iki farklı yol izlenmiştir. İlk olarak ölçeğin alt ölçekleri açısından aşırı iki uçta puan alan gruplar t-testi ile karşılaştırılmış; üst ve alt gruplar arasındaki farkın alt ölçekler için anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur. İkinci olarak iki alt boyuttan elde edilen toplam Makyavelizm puanı ile narsisizm, duyarsızlık ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar arasındaki korelasyonlar hesaplanmıştır. Tüm korelasyonlar beklendiği yönde anlamlı bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar Makyavelizm Ölçeği’nin Türkçe konuşan ergenler için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğunu göstermiştir.
Referanslar
Aalsma, M. C., Lapsley, D. K. ve Flannery, D. J. (2006). Personal fables, narcissism, and adolescent adjustment. Psychology in Schools, 43, 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20162
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4. baskı). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Bakır, B., Özer, M. ve Uçar, M. (2005). Reliability of the Turkish version of mach IV scale: Results obtained from two previously published studies. Psychological Reports, 96, 889-890. https://doi.org/ 10.2466/pr0.96.3c.889-890
Bakır, B., Yılmaz, U. R. ve Yavaş, İ. (1996). Relating depressive symptoms to machiavellianism in a Turkish sample. Psychological Reports, 78, 1011-1014. https://doi.org/ 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3.1011
Barnett, M. A. ve Thompson, S. (1985). The role of perspective taking and empathy in children's Machiavellianism, prosocial behavior, and motive for helping. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1985.9914459
Barry, C.T., ve Kauten, R. L. (2014). Nonpathological and pathological Narcissism: Which self-reported characteristics are most problematic in adolescents? Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 212-219. . https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.830264
Barry, C. T., Pickard, J. D., ve Ansel, L. L. (2009). The associations of adolescent invulnerability and narcissism with problem behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 577-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.022
Bayraktar, F. ve Amca, H. (2012). Interrelations between virtual life and real life activities: Comparison of genders, age groups, pathological and non-pathological internet users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0337
Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B. ve Kerekes, Z. (2010). The presence of others, prosocial traits, Machiavellianism: A personality × situation approach. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
Berger, C., Batanova, M. ve Cance, J. D. (2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, Machiavellianism, and empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2230– 2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0298-9
Bleiberg, E. (1994). Normal and pathological narcissism in adolescence. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 48, 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.1.30
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Basic concepts. U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), The ecology of human development içinde (s. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3438
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
Christie, R. ve Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958540
Cudeck, R. ve Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x
Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.11
Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341260
Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S. ve Frick, P. J. (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106287354
DeLisi, M., Pechorro, P., Maroco, J. ve Sim, M. (2021). Overlapping measures or constructs? An empirical study of the overlap between self-control, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and narcissism. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100141
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G. ve Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Güldü, Ö. ve Dönmez, A. (2002). Aşırı uçlarda siyasal tutumlara sahip üniversite öğrencilerinin bazı psikolojik değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 129- 142. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000057
Güney, S. ve Mandacı, G. (2009). Makyavelizm ve etik algısı ilişkileri: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 83-104.
Hill, P. L. ve Lapsley, D. K. (2011). Adaptive and maladaptive narcissism in adolescent development. C. T. Barry, P. K. Kerig, K. K. Stellwagen ve T. D. Barry (Ed.), Narcissism and Machiavellianism in youth: Implications for the development of adaptive and maladaptive behavior içinde (s. 89–105). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12352-005
Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180
Kasapoğlu, A. (1999). Tıp Eğitimi: Uygulamalı sosyolojik bir araştırma. M. Ecevit ve A. Kasapoğlu (Ed.), Sağlık Sosyolojisi içinde. Ankara, Türkiye: Sosyoloji Derneği.
Kerig, P. K. ve Stellwagen, K. K. (2009). Roles of callous-unemotional traits, narcissism, and machiavellianism in childhood aggression. Journal of Psyhopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9168-7
Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A. ve Limber, S. P. (2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33, 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312445244
Lee, S. A. (2019). The Dark Tetrad and callous reactions to mourner grief: Patterns of annoyance, boredom, entitlement, schadenfreude, and humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.019
Lo, C. F. ve Ng, E. C. B. (2019). Machiavellianism and ıntimacy attitudes in the ınterpersonal relationships. Psychology, 10, 424-433. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.104029
McHoskey, J. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 77, 755–759. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.755
Nostrand, D. F. V. ve Ojanen, T. (2018). Forms of prosocial behaviors are differentially linked to social goals and peer status in adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179, 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1518894
Özsoy, E. ve Ardıç, K. (2017). Karanlık üçlü’nün (narsisizm, makyavelizm ve psikopati) iş tatminine etkisinin incelenmesi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 24, 391-406. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.297733
Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K. ve Ardıç, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS- T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019
Pabian, S., De Backer, C. J. S. ve Vandebosch, H. (2015). Dark triad personality traits and adolescent cyber- aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.015
Paulhus, D. L. ve Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Raskin, R. ve Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z. ve Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer Ethics: A cross-cultural study of the ethical beliefs of Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5092-7
Repacholi, B., Slaughter, V., Pritchard, M. ve Gibbs, V. (2003). Theory of mind, Machiavellianism, and social functioning in childhood. B. Repacholi ve V. Slaughter (Ed.), Individual differences in theory of mind içinde (s. 67–97). NY: Psychology Press.
Roberts, B. W. ve Helson, R. (1997). Changes in culture, changes in personality: The influence of individualism in a longitudinal study of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.641
Schooler, C. (1990). Individualism and historical and social-structural determinants of people’s concerns over self-directedness and efficacy. J. Rudin, C. Schooler ve K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Self-Directedness: Cause and Effects Throughout the Life Course içinde (s. 19-50). Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slaughter, V. (2011). Early adoption of Machiavellian attitudes: Implications for children’s interpersonal relationships. C. T. Barry, P. K. Kerig, K. K. Stellwagen ve T. D. Barry (Ed.), Narcissism and Machiavellianism in Youth: Implications for the Development of Adaptive and Maladaptive Behavior içinde (s. 177-192). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Subrahmanyam, K. ve Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18, 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0006
Sutton, J. ve Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158227
Thomaes, S., Stegge, H., Bushman, B. J., Olthof, T. ve Denissen, J. (2008). Development and validation of the childhood narcissism scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802108162
Wright, M. F. ve Li, Y. (2012). Kicking the digital dog: A longitudinal investigation of young adults' victimization and cyber-displaced aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 448-454. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0061
Wright, M. F., Li, Y. ve Shi, J. (2014). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth & Society, 46, 566-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12448800
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2021 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi