Anahtar Kelimeler
öz-yeterlilik inancı
kişisel inisiyatif
iş güvenliği
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Öz
Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik güvenlik ve beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif arasında mesleki öz-yeterlilik inancının aracı rolünü araştırmaktır. Ayrıca, beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif ölçeği Türkçeye uyarlanmıştır. Öncelikle, beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerini test etmek için 100 iş güvenliği üzerinde bir pilot çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonrasında, psikolojik güvenlik, mesleki öz-yeterlilik inancı ve beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif ölçekleri katılımcılara anonim bir link aracılığıyla gönderilmiştir. Pilot çalışmada olduğu gibi, kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Eksik veriden dolayı 443 yanıttan 111’i elenmiş ve kalan 332 katılımcı üzerinden veri analiz edilmiştir. Korelasyon analizi sonuçları psikolojik güvenlik, mesleki öz-yeterlilik inancı ve beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göste Regresyon analizleri sonucunda mesleki öz-yeterlilik inancının psikolojik güvenlik ve beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif arasında aracı rolü olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, uyarlanan beyana dayalı kişisel inisiyatif ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin Türk örnekleminde uygulanabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.
Referanslar
Akboğa Kale et al., (2018). A field study about the development of occupational safety expertise system Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 20(2), 177-190.
Aksoy, Ş. (2019) The relationship between challenges of occupational safety specialists, psychological safety, professional self – efficacy belief and proactive work behavior. Master Thesis, Istanbul Bilgi University, İstanbul, Turkey
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise Of Control, New York: Freeman.
Crant, J. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532-537
ÇSGB, ILO (2017). İş Güvenliği Uzmanlarının Görev ve Sorumluluklarının Yürütülmesi ile ilgili Araştırma. Ankara. Turkey
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70, 139-l 61.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Self-reported personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37– 63
Gong, Y., Huang, J.C., Farh, J.L. (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad. Manag. J, 52, 765– 778.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work-role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression- based approach. Guilford Press.
Heuven, E., Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Huisman, N. (2006) The role of self-efficacy in performing emotion work. J. Vocat. Behav. 69, 222–235
Kish-Gephart, J.J., Detert, J.R., Treviño, L.K. & Edmondson, A.C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Res. Organ. Behav., 29, 163–193
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868.
Mensah, A.O. & Lebbaeus, A. (2013). The influence of employees’ self-efficacy on their quality of work life: The case of Cape Coast, Ghana. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., 4, 195–205.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiative workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. Doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behaviour at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652.
Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 401–411.
Roussin, C. J., Larraz, E., Jamieson, K., & Maestre, J. M. (2018). Psychological safety, self-efficacy, and speaking up in interprofessional health care simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 17, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.12.002.
Susan J. Ashford, Nancy Rothbard, Sandy Kristin Piderit, Jane E. Dutton (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 23-58
Walumbwa, F.O., Mayer, D.M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., Christensen, A.L. (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 115, 204–213
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, 309–333.
Xie, J., Chu, X., Zhang, J. & Huang, J. (2014). Proactive personality and voice behavior: The influence of voice self-efficacy and delegation. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J., 42, 1191–1200.
Yener (2015). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the psychological safety, OÜSBAD, 280 – 305
Xue, Y., Li, X., Liang, H., & Li Y. (2020). How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees’ Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1162.
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2020 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi