KADINLAR VE ERKEKLER NASIL ALGILANIR? GÜNÜMÜZ TÜRKİYE’SİNDE TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET KALIPYARGILARININ YAPISI
Cilt 6 Sayı 13 kapak
PDF

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cinsiyet kalıpyargıları
Cinsiyetçilik
Erkeklik
Serbest cevap yöntemi
Türkiye

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KADINLAR VE ERKEKLER NASIL ALGILANIR? GÜNÜMÜZ TÜRKİYE’SİNDE TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET KALIPYARGILARININ YAPISI. (2018). Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(13), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-06-13-04

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk kültüründe kadınların ve erkeklerin nasıl algılandıklarını incelemektir. Serbest cevap yöntemi kullanılarak kadınlar ve erkeklerle ilintili en çok kullanılan kalıpyargılar belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen bu kalıpyargılar, belirli temalara göre düzenlenerek Türk kültüründeki toplumsal cinsiyet kalıpyargılarının yapısı gözler önüne serilmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmaya 491 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Katılımcılardan kadınları ve erkekleri tanımlayan 10 sıfat yazmaları istenmiştir. Frekans analizine göre, kadınlar en çok duygusal, kıskanç, alıngan, sadık, hassas, fedakar, sevecen, akıllı, duyarlı, dedikoducu, hırslı, şefkatli, güzel, düşünceli, çalışkan, çekici ve kırılgan sıfatları ile tanımlanırken; erkekler en çok kıskanç, güçlü, bencil, duygusal, hırslı, sinirli, kaba, çocuksu, mantıklı, çalışkan, zeki, dürüst, cesur ve koruyucu sıfatları ile tanımlanmıştır. İlaveten, elde edilen kalıpyargılar, görünüm, kişilik, cinsiyet rolleri ve güç olmak üzere dört temel tema ve onların alt temalarına göre toplanarak toplumsal cinsiyet kalıpyargılarının yapısı gösterilmeye çalışılmıştır. Buna göre, kadınlar için kalıpyargılar sırasıyla kişilik özellikleri (sevecenlik, bencillik, kırılganlık, amil, sosyallik), cinsiyet rolleri (annelik ve sadakat), görünüm ve güç (güçlülük ve zayıflık) temaları altında toplanmıştır. Erkekler için kalıpyargılar ise, sırasıyla, kişilik özellikleri (bencillik, amil, duygusallık, sorumsuzluk, sosyallik, duygusuzluk, çapkınlık), güç (erkeklik ve baskınlık), cinsiyet rolleri (babalık/ev reisliği ve sadakat) ve görünüm temaları altında toplanmıştır. Bulgular kalıpyargılar, toplumsal cinsiyetçilik ve erkeklik yazınının ışığı altında tartışılmıştır.

PDF

Referanslar

Aktan, T., & Bilim, G. (2016). Kadınlara yönelik kalıpyargıların içerikleri: Kalıpyargı içeriği modeli çerçevesinde bir inceleme [Contents of stereotypes toward woman subgroups: An investigation in the framework of stereotype content model]. Nesne, 4(8), 147-182. http//dx.doi.org/10.7816/nesne-04-08-01

Ashmore, R., & Del Boca, F. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5(2), 219-248. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00287932

Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca, (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analyses of central concepts (pp. 69-119). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Bekker, M. H. J., & Boselie, K. A. H. M. (2002). Gender and stress: Is gender role stress? A re-examination of the relationship between feminine gender role stress and eating disorders. Stress and Health, 18(3), 141–149. http://doi.org/10.1002/smi.933

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036215

Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1142-1163.

Bolak-Boratav, H., Okman-Fişek, G., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). Erkekliğin Türkiye halleri [Manhood in Turkey] (1st ed.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi University Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http//dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665-692. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.5.3.665

Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1999). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Society, 13(4), 679–696.

Cuddy, A. J. C., Wolf, B. E., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 622-635. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027

Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern homicide. Personality and Social Personality Bulletin, 20, 551-567.

Çelik, K., & Lüküslü, D. (2012). Spotlighting a silent category of young females: The life experiences of “house girls” in Turkey. Youth & Society, 44(1), 28–48. http//dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10391636

Çopur, Z., & Koropeckyj-Cox, T. (2010). University students’ perception of childless couples and parents in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1481- 1506. http//dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10361577

Dalmış, İ., & İmamoğlu, E. O. (2000). Yetişkinlerin ve üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyo-politik kimlik algıları [The perceived socio-political identity domains of Turkish adults and university students]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15, 1-14.

Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39(2), 105-116. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.39.2.105

Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds), Handbook on the psychology of women (pp. 107-139). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991-1004. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.991

Deaux, K., Winston, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3(2), 145-167. https://goi.org/10.152/soco.1985.3.2.145

Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50(3– 4), 201–215. http://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000015552.22775.44

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs:Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.

Dökmen, Z. Y. (1999). BEM cinsiyet rolü envanteri kadınsılık ve erkeksilik ölçekleri Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri [Psychometric properties of the Turkish form of femininity and masculinity scales of BEM gender role inventory]. Kriz Dergisi, 7(1), 27-40. http//dx.doi.org/10.1501/0000901

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 543-558. http//dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154008

Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735-754. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.735

Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 915-928. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.5.915

Elgin, M. V. (2016). Examining honor culture in Turkey: Honor, manhood, and man- to-man response to insult (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12619934/index.pdf

Ellis, L., & Bentler, P. (1973). Traditional sex-determined role standards and sex stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 28-34. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034262

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878

Frederick, D. A., & Fales, M. R. (2016). Upset over sexual versus emotional infidelity among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 175–191. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0409-9

Gillespie, B. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1992). Development of the feminine gender role stress scale. A cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behav Modif, 16(3), 426–438. http://doi.org/10.1177/01454455920163008

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519-536. http//dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x

Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Metin Orta, I., & Ceylan, S. (2016). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75, 543-554. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0550-5

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self- esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.

Hortaçsu, N., & Ertürk, E. M. (2003). Women and ideology: Representations of women in religious and secular Turkish media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(10), 2017-2039. http//dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01873.x

Husnu, S. (2016). The role of ambivalent sexism and religiosity in predicting attitudes toward childlessness in Muslim undergraduate students. Sex Roles, 75, 573-582. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0639-5

İmamoğlu, O., & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (1999). 1970'lerden 1990'lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları [Value preferences from 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14, 19–22.

İmamoğlu, O., & Yasak-Gültekin, Y. (1993). Gazetelerde kadının ve erkeğin temsil edilişi [Representation of women and men in newspapers]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 8(29), 23-30.

Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498-509. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1981). Çocuğun değeri: Türkiye'de değerler ve doğurganlık [Value of children: Values and fertility in Turkey]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yayınları.

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982). Old-age security value of children: Cross-national socioeconomic evidence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13(1), 29- 42.

Kandiyoti, D. (1978). Kadınlarda psiko-sosyal değişim boyutları: Cinsiyet ve kuşaklar arası bir karşılaştırma [Dimensions of psycho-social change in women: A comparison between genders and generations]. Unpublished associate professorship thesis. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.

Kandiyoti, D. (1995). Patterns of patriarchy: Notes for an analysis of male dominance in Turkish society. In S. Tekeli (Ed.), Women in modern Turkish society (pp. 306–318). London: Zed Books.

Levant, R., Smalley, K., Aupont, M., House, A., Richmond, K., & Noronha, D. (2007). Initial validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI- R). The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(1), 83–100. http://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1501.83

Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25. http://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3

Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150-163.

O’Leary, K.D., Smith Slep, A. M., & O’Leary, S. G. (2007). Multivariate models of men’s and women’s partner aggression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 752-764. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.752

Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. http//dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066

Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1164-1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009

Rudman, L., Moss-Racusin, C., Phelan, J., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165-179. http//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Akbaş, G. (2013). “Honor” and “violence against women in the name of honor” in honor cultures. Turkish Psychological Articles,16 (32), 76-91.

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 296-302. http//dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552194

Sakallı Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A., & Gupta, A. (2018). Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Current Psychology, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, S. Z., & Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11/12), 889-895. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2

Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29-39. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076857

Sunar, D. (1982). Female stereotypes in the United States and Turkey: An application of functional theory to perception in power relationships. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 13(4), 445-460. http//dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002182013004004

Thompson, E. H., & Bennett, K. M. (2015). Measurement of masculinity ideologies : A (critical) review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(2), 1–19. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038609

Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531-543. http//dx.doi.org/10.1177/000276486029005003

Twenge, J. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta- analysis. Sex Roles, 36(5-6), 305-325. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02766650

Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826

Vandello, J., Bosson, J., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R., & Weaver, J. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325-1339. http//dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012453

Vandello, J., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997–1010. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997

Vandello, J. A., Cohen, D., Grandon, R., & Franiuk, R. (2009). Stand by your man: Indirect prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 81–104. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326194

Williams, J., & Bennett, S. (1975). The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective check list. Sex Roles, 1(4), 327-337. http//dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00287224

Wilson, T. (1996). Cohort and prejudice: Whites' attitudes toward Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 253-274. http//dx.doi.org/10.1086/297750

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 629-667). New York, NY: Wiley. http//dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001017

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Telif Hakkı (c) 2018 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi