GRUPLAR ARASI İLİŞKİLERİ DÜZENLEMEDE SOSYAL TEMAS KURAMLARI: GRUPLAR ARASI, YAYILMACI VE HAYALİ TEMAS
Cilt 5 Sayı 9 kapak
PDF

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal temas kuramı
yayılmacı temas
hayali temas
önyargı
ayrımcılık
tutum değişimi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

GRUPLAR ARASI İLİŞKİLERİ DÜZENLEMEDE SOSYAL TEMAS KURAMLARI: GRUPLAR ARASI, YAYILMACI VE HAYALİ TEMAS. (2017). Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 5(9), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-05-09-01

Öz

Sosyal temas kuramları, gruplar arası ilişkileri düzenlemek adına yöntemler sunan kuramlardır. Bu kuramlar Allport’un (1954) sosyal temas hipoteziyle başlamış ve daha sonrasında yayılmacı temas ve hayali temas kuramlarıyla farklı durumlara uygun temas çözümleri sunarak devam etmiştir. Bu makalenin amacı, psikoloji yazınında en eski kuramlardan biri olan gruplar arası temas kuramını ve bu kurama dayanan yayılmacı temas ve hayali temas kuramlarını alanda yapılmış çalışmalar ile derleyerek ilgili yazına Türkçe bir kaynak sağlamaktadır. Bu amaçla hazırlanan bu derleme makalesi temelde üç bölümden oluşmaktadır ve her bölüm sosyal temas kuramlarından birini açıklamaktadır. İlk bölüm, gruplar arası temas kuramının tarihsel gelişimini ve yapılan çalışmalar sonucu ortaya çıkarılan etkilerini ve mekanizmalarını içermektedir. Bu bölümde ayrıca iki ana başlık bulunmaktadır. Bu başlıklar Allport’un (1954) sosyal temas hipotezinde ve Pettigrew’in (1998) gruplar arası temas kuramında bulunan savları ve ilgili bulguları içermektedir. İkinci bölüm, yayılmacı temas kuramını; üçüncü bölüm ise hayali temas kuramını ve yazındaki bulguları içermektedir.

PDF

Referanslar

Aberson, C. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760.

Abrams, D., Crisp, R. J, Marques, S., Fagg, E., Bedford, L. ve Provias, D. (2008). Threat inoculation: Experienced and imagined intergenerational contact prevents stereotype threat effects on older people’s math performance. Psychology and Aging, 23, 934–939.

Akbaş, G. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations: The case of Alevis and Sunnis in Amasya. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Akdoğan, N. (2015). Basit kategorizasyona karşı çapraz kategorizasyonun gruplar arası ilişkiler üzerindeki etkisi: Ertuşi ve Pinyanişi aşiret grupları. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Uludağ Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.

Aktan, T. ve Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2013). Kalıpyargı içeriği modeline sosyal bağlamsal bir yaklaşım: Bağlam içinde kalıpyargı içerikleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 16(31), 15-31.

Allport, G. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. P.A. Katz (Ed.), Toward the elimination of racism (s. 245- 308). New York: Pergamon.

Aronson, E. ve Cope, V. (1968). My enemy's enemy is my friend. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 8-12.

Baysu, G., Phalet, K. ve Brown, R. (2014). Relative group size and minority school success: The role of intergroup friendship and discrimination experiences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 328–349

Bem, D. J. (1972). Constructing cross‐ situational consistencies in behavior: Some thoughts on Alker's critique of Mischel. Journal of Personality, 40(1), 17- 26.

Bikmen, N. (1999). National identity and ethnic prejudice in Turkish sample. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Bilkent Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., ... ve Leyens, J. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843-856.

Brambilla, M., Ravenna, M. ve Hewstone, M. (2012). Changing stereotype content through mental imagery: Imagining intergroup contact promotes stereotype change. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 15(3), 305-315.

Brewer, M. B. ve Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36(1), 219-243.

Brophy, I. N. (1946). The luxury of anti-negro prejudice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 9, 456-466.

Brown, R., Vivian, J. ve Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 741-764.

Bükün, M. F. ve Cingöz-Ulu, B. (Kasım, 2016). Alevi kimliği, madımak hatıraları ve iç-grup yanlılığında gruplar arası temasın düzenleyici etkisi. 1. Sosyal Psikoloji Kongresinde sunulan sözlü bildiri, Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye, 17-19 Kasım.

Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R. ve Douch, R. (2006). Changing children's intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77(5), 1208-1219.

Castelli, L., De Amicis, L., ve Sherman, S. J. (2007). The loyal member effect: On the preference for ingroup members who engage in exclusive relations with the ingroup. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1347–1359.

Christ, O., Hewstone, M., Tausch, N., Wagner, U., Voci, A., Hughes, J. ve Cairns, E. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross- sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, ans attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1662-1672.

Çelik, A. B. (2014). Encounters and perceptions: A descriptive study on the local and Kurdish residents of Lüleburgaz. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sabancı Üniversitesi/Sanat ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, İstanbul.

Çırakoğlu, O. C. (2006). Perception of homosexuality among Turkish university students: The role of labels, gender, and prior contact. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 293-305.

Clack, B., Dixon, J. ve Tredoux, C. (2005). Eating together apart: Patterns of segregation in a multi- ethnic cafeteria. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 1–16.

Cohen, E. G. ve Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99- 120.

Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. N. Miller ve M. Brewer (Ed.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (s. 155- 185). New York: American Press.

Crisp, R. J. Husnu, S., Meleady, R. Stathi, S. ve Turner, R. N. (2010). From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 188-236.

Crisp, R. J. ve Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perception? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist 64(4), 231-240.

Deutsch, M. ve Collins, M. (1951). Interracial housing: A psychological evaluation of a social experiment. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Durmaz, A. (2015). Alevi ve Sünnilerde sosyal kimlik ve ön yargı (Malatya örneği). (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Dicle Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Diyarbakır.

Eller, A. ve Abrams, D. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256.

Eller, A., Abrams, D. ve Gomez, A. (2012). When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 637–646.

Farah, M. J. (1989). The neural basis of mental imagery. Trends in Neurosciences, 12(10), 395-399.

Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Los Angeles: Stanford University Press.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P. ve Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.

Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B. ve Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 4, 843-853.

Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J. A., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M. ve ark. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388–402.

Gelbal, S. ve Duyan, V. (2006). Attitudes of university students toward lesbian and gay men in Turkey. Sex Roles, 55, 573-579.

Güler, M. (2013). Gruplar arası temas, kaygı ve yanlılığın sosyal mesafeye etkisi: Türk ve Kürt kökenli gruplar üzerine bir çalışma. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Harwood, J., Paolini, S., Joyce, N., Rubin, M. ve Arroyo, A. (2010). Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 180- 189.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley

Hewstone, M. E. ve Brown, R. E. (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Basil: Blackwell.

Hewstone, M., Lolliot, S., Swart, H., Myers, E., Voci, A., Al Ramiah, A., ve Cairns, E. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20(1), 39-53.

Husnu, S. ve Crisp, R. J. (2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943-950.

Husnu, S. ve Crisp, R. J. (2011). Current problems and resolutions: Enhancing the imagined contact effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 116(1), 113- 116.

Husnu, S. Ve Lajunen, T. (2015). Predictors of intergroup bias in Turkish Cypriots. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 63-71.

Husnu, S. ve Mertan, B. (2008). Intergroup contact: the case of Cyprus. International Congress of Psychology’de sunulan bildiri, Berlin, Germany.

Jackman, M. R. ve Crane, M. (1986). “Some of my best friends are black…”: Interracial friendship and whites' racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(4), 459-486.

Karaoğlu, E. (2015). The role of social dominance orientation, empathy and perceived threat in predicting prejudice of Turkish citizens toward Syrian immigrants. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Kokkonen, A., Esaiasson, P. ve Gilljam, M. (2015). Contact in context: Does intergroup contact function (beter) in high threat contexts?. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1-19.

Koschate, M. ve Van Dick, R. (2011). A multilevel test of Allport’s contact conditions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(6), 769-787.

Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G. ve Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of magery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 635-642.

Kuchenbrandt, D. ve Eyssel, F.A. (2011). Don't think..feel! The effects of affective versus cognitive focus during imagined intergroup contact. Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology’de sunulan bildiri, Istanbul, Turkey.

Kunduz, C. Ö. (2009). An exploration of the predictors of prejudice among students with and without headcover. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Küçükkömürler, S. (2013). Reducing prejudice through imagined social contact. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Lee, T. L. ve Fiske, S. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751–768.

Lemmer, G. ve Wagner, U. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 152–168 .

Lolliot, S.D., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Al Ramiah, A., Tausch, N. ve Swart, H. (2013). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. G. Hodson, ve M. Hewstone (Ed.), Advances in intergroup contact (s.81-112). London, UK: Psychology Press.

Mallett, R. K., Akimoto, S. ve Oishi, S. (2015). Affect and understanding during everyday cross-race experiences. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication.

Marques, J. M. ve Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgemental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287–292.

McGarry, J. ve O’leary, B. (1995). Explaining Northern Ireland. Oxford: Blackwell.

McLaren, L. M. 2003. Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces 81(3), 909–936.

Miles, E. ve Crisp, R. C. (2014). A meta-analitic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 17 (1), 3-26.

Munniksma, A., Stark, T. H., Verkuyten, M., Flache, A. ve Veenstra, R. (2013). Extended intergroup friendships within social settings: The moderating role of initial outgroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 752–770.

Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E. ve Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgements of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.

Paterson, J. L., Turner, R. N. ve Conner, M. T. (2015). Extended contact through cross-group romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 489-497.

Pettigrew, T. F. (1986). The contact hypothesis revisited. Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, 49, 169-195.

Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173-185.

Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49, 65-85.

Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to non-contacted outgroups?. Social Psychology, 40(2), 55- 65.

Pettigrew, T. F. (2016). In Pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. The Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 1-21.

Pettigrew, T. F. ve Troop, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-786.

Pettigrew, T. F. ve Troop, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.

Pettigrew, T. F. ve Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York: Psychology Press.

Rock, I. (1995). Perception. Scientific American Library. New York (distributed in the United Kingdom by WHFreeman, Oxford).

Sakallı, N. ve Uğurlu, O. (2001). Effects of social contact with homosexuals on heterosexual Turkish university students’ attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 53-61.

Sakallı, N. ve Uğurlu, O. (2002). The effects of social contact with a lesbian person on the attitude change toward homosexuality in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 44(1), 111-118.

Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 24(1), 53–67.

Schofield, J.W. Hausmann, L.R.M., Yee, F. ve Woods, R. L. (2010). Intergroup friendship on campus: Predicting close and casual friendships between White and African-American first-year college students. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13(5), 585-602.

Schroeder, J. ve Risen, J. L. (2016). Befriending the enemy: Outgroup friendship longitudinally predicts intergroup attitudes in a coexistence program for Israelis and Palestinians. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 72–93.

Sever, G. (2014). Predictors of prejudice against different types of head-covering practices. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Sharp, M., Voci, A. ve Hewstone, M. (2011). Individual difference variables as moderators of the effect of extended cross-group friendship on prejudice: Testing the effects of public self- consciousness and social comparison. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 207– 221.

Shook,N. J., Hopkins, P. D. ve Koech, J. M. (2015). The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(3), 328-347.

Stathi, S., Cameron, L., Hartley, B. ve Bradford, S. (2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice-reduction in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitude. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 536–546.

Stathi, S. ve Crisp, R. J. (2008). Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 943-957.

Stathi, S., Crisp, R. J. ve Hogg, M. A. (2011). Imagining ıntergroup contact enables member to group generalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(3), 275-284.

Stein, R. M., Post, S. S. ve Rinden, A. L. (2000). Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 285–303.

Stephan, C. W., Stephan, W. G., Demitrakis, K. M., Yamada, A. M. ve Clason, D. L. (2000). Women’s attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 63–73.

Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., … ve Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242– 1254.

Stephan, W. G. ve Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729–743.

Stephan, W. G. ve Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup Anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–176.

Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood. W. R. ve Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robber’s Cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Institute of Intergroup Relations.

Sherif , M. ve Sherif, C. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper ve Row Publishers.

Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B. ve Cairns, E. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45–59.

Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., Hughes, J. ve Cairns, E. (2011). Extended contact as a function of closeness of relationship with ingroup contacts. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 239–254.

Tropp, L. R. ve Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive indicators of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145-1158.

Turner, R. N. ve Crisp, R. J. (2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142.

Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J. ve Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 427-441.

Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci A. ve Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 843-860.

Turner, R. N. ve West, K. (2011). Behavioral consequences of imagining intergroup contact with stigmatized outgroups. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 193-202.

Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Groenewoud, J. T. ve Hewstone, M. (1996). Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 649-661.

Vezzali, L., Giovannini, D. ve Capozza, D. (2012). Social antecedents of children’s implicit prejudice: Direct contact, extended contact, explicit and implicit teachers’ prejudice. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 569–581.

Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Crisp, R. J., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D. ve Gaertner, S. L. (2015). Imagined intergroup contact and common ingroup identity: An integrative approach. Social Psychology, 46(5), 265–276.

Vezzali, L., Stathi, S. ve Giovannini, D. (2012). Indirect contact through book reading: Improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 148–162.

Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D. ve Visintin, E. P. (2015). ‘And the best essay is. . .’: Extended contact and cross-group friendships at school. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 601–615.

Vonofakou, C., Hewstone, M. ve Voci, A. (2007). Contact with outgroup friends as a predictor of meta­attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes towards gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804­820.

Wagner, U., Christ, O. ve Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Prejudice and group related behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 403­416.

Wagner, U. ve Machleit, U. (1986). “Gastarbeiter” in the Federal Republic of Germany: Contact between Germans and migrant populations. M. Hewstone ve R. Brown (Ed.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. New York: Basil Blackwell.

West, K., Holmes, E. A. ve Hewstone, M. (2011). Enhancing imagined contact to reduce prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 407–428.

West, K., Husnu, S. ve Lipps, G. (2015). Imagined contact Works in high-prejudice contexts: Investigating imagined contact’s effects on anti-gay prejudice in Cyprus and Jamaica. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 60-69. Doi. 10.1007/s13178-014-0172-7.

West, K., Turner, R. ve Levita, L. (2015). Applying imagined contact to improve physiological responses in anticipation of intergroup interactions and the perceived quality of these interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 425-436.

Wilder, D. A. ve Thompson, J. E. (1980). Intergroup contact with independent manipulations on in-group and out-group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 589-603.

Wilner, D. M., Walkley, R. P. ve Cook, S. W. (1955). Human relations in interracial housing: A study of the contact hypothesis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. ve Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.

Yürek, N. (2014). Encounters and perceptions: A descriptive study on the local and Kurdish residents of Lüleburgaz (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sabancı Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Telif Hakkı (c) 2017 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi