ÇELİŞİK DUYGULU CİNSİYETÇİLİK ÜZERİNDE DİNİ YÖNELİM TİPLERİNİN YORDAYICI GÜCÜ

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0021212

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113- 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4

Altınay, A. G. (2004). The myth of the military-nation: Militarism, gender and education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.

Anwar, E. (2006). Gender and self in Islam. Oxon: Routledge.

Başaran, F. (1974). Psiko-sosyal gelişim (psycho-social development). Ankara: Ankara University Press.

Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 29-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1384312

Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Batson, C. D., & Stocks, E. L. (2005). Religion and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. S. Glick, and L. Rudman (Eds.). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (p. 413-427). Oxford: Blackwell.

Cagaptay, S. (2006). Islam, secularism and nationalism in modern Turkey: Who is a Turk? London: Routledge.

Carreiras, H. (2004). Gender and the military: A comparative study on the participation of the women in the armed forces of Western democracies. Doctoral Dissertation, European Research Institute, Florence.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047358

Flere, S. (2007). Gender and religious orientation. Social Compass, 54(2), 239-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037768607077035

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrahms, D., Masser, B., ... Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763

Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., ... Wells, R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713

Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Metin-Orta, İ., & Ceylan, S. (2015). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0550-5

Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068

Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on effect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13(3), 219-236.

Heper, M. (1985). The state tradition in Turkey. Wolkington: Eothen.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

İlkkaracan, P. (1998). Doğu Anadolu’da kadın ve aile. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x

Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982). Sex roles, value of children and fertility. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey (pp. 151-180). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., & Sunar, D. (1992). Family and socialization in Turkey. In. J. L. Roopnarine and D. B. Carter (Eds.), Annual advances in applied developmental psychology: Vol. 5. Parent-child socialization in diverse cultures (pp. 75-88). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., & İmamoğlu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 333- 351.

Kuloğlu, C. (2005). The military in Turkey from a gender perspective. Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

McClearly, D. F., Quillivan, C. C., Foster, L. N., & Williams, R. L. (2011). Meta- analysis of correlational relationships between perspectives of truth in religion and major psychological constructs. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(3), 163-180.

Özkan, T., & Lajunen T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem sex role inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52(1), 103-110.

Pew Research Center. (2011). The Future of the Global Muslim Population. Washington: Religion & Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/.

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. (Ambivalent sexism scale: A study of validity and reliability). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (The Journal of Turkish Psychology), 17(49), 47-58.

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Religious orientation scale. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, S. Z., & Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57(11/12), 889-895.

Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and individual differences, 32, 15-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0191-8869(00)00233-6

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagıtcibasi, S-C, Choi and G. Yoon (Eds.). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (p. 85-119). London: Sage.

Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1

Sunar, D. (1982). Female stereotypes in the U.S. and Turkey: An application of functional theory to perceptions in power relations. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 13, 445-460.

Sünbüloğlu, N. Y. (2013). Erkek millet asker millet: Türkiye'de militarism, milliyetçilik, erkek(lik)ler. İstanbul: İletişimYayıncılık.

Taşdemir, N., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6

Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1987). Gender differences in religion: A test of the structural location theory. American Sociological Review, 52, 472-481.

Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.

World Economic Forum. (2014). The global gender gap report - 2014. Cologny, Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR14/GGGR_CompleteReport_2014.p df