Öz
Bu makalenin amacı gruplar arası ilişkiler bağlamında diğer gruba zarar verme sonucunda bireylerin grup üyeliklerine bağlı olarak hissedebilecekleri kolektif suçluluk duyma ve bu duygudan kaçınmak için kullanılan stratejileri kapsayan çalışmaları derleyerek alana tanıtmaktır. Bu kapsamda öncelikle kolektif suçluluk duyma kavramı tanımlanmaktadır. Bu tanımlamada kolektif suçluluk duymaya alternatif olarak kullanılan bazı psikolojik süreçlere değinilmekte ve kolektif suçluluğun kişisel suçluluk ve kolektif utançtan farklılıkları sunulmaktadır. Daha sonra dünyada kolektif suçluluğun görülüp görülemeyeceği ele alınmakta ve araştırmacılar tarafından bu duyguyu oluşturabileceği öne sürülen sosyal psikolojik unsurlar üzerinde durulmaktadır. Bu unsurlar zarar veren grubun bir üyesi olarak kendini sınıflandırma; verilen zararda iç grubun sorumluluğu olduğunu kabul etme; zarar verici hareketlerin uygunsuz olduğunu algılama ve zararın düzeltilmesinde iç grubun ödemesi gereken bedel miktarı olarak sıralanmaktadır. Belirtilen unsurlara bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan kolektif suçluluk ve bu suçluluğu takip edebilecek çıktıların neler olduğu hakkında yürütülen araştırma bulguları paylaşılmaktadır. Son olarak, genel bir sonuç ve öneriler bölümü sunulmaktadır.
Referanslar
Batson, C. D., Early, S. ve Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758.
Bilali, R., Tropp, L. R. ve Dasgupta, N. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18, 21-39.
Branscombe, N. R. (2004). A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds). Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp.320-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B. ve McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie ve E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T. ve Schiffhauer, K. (2007). Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of White privilege. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 203-215.
Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B. ve Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurment of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16-34) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J. ve Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reperation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 75-90.
Caouette, J., Wohl, M. J. A. ve Peetz, J. (2012). The future weighs heavier than the past: Collective guilt, perceived control and the influence of time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 363-371.
Castano, E. ve Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 804-818.
Cehajic-Clancy, S., Effron, D. A., Halperin, E., Liberman, V. ve Ross, L. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 256–270.
Cohen, D. ve Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining Southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551-567.
Doosje, B. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilt by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Consequences of national ingroup identification for resonses to immoral historical events. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 95-111) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Doosje, B. E. J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 325–338.
Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergent, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S.L., Johnson, J. D. ve Esses, V. M. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and medaiting mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537-1549.
Ferguson, M. A. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Enviromental Psychology, 30, 135-142.
Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A. ve Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of common identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249.
Garcia, D. M., Reser, A. H., Amo, R. B., Redersdroff, S. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personlity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 769-780.
Islam, M. ve Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and effective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936-950.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W. ve Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personlity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W. ve Pedersen, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt:International perspectives (pp. 262–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jelic, M., Biruski, D. K. ve Adjukovic, D. (2013). Predictors of collective guilt after the violent conflict. Collegium Antropologicum, 37(1), 1-10.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. ve Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the statu quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919.
Klandermans, B., Werner, M. ve van Doorn, M. (2008). Redeeming apartheid’s legacy: Collective guilt, political ideology, and compensation. Political Psychology, 29(3), 331-349.
Klein, O., Licata, L. ve Pierucci, S. (2011). Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 563–572. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02028.x
Kofta, M. ve Slawuta, P. (2013). Thou shall not kill… Your brother: Victim- perpetrator cultural closeness and moral disapproval of Polish atrocities against Jews after the Holucaust. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 54-73.
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N. ve Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A. ve Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232-1245. doi:10.1177/0146167206289729
Leonard, M. A., Yung, S. M. ve Cairns, E. (2015). Predicting intergroup forgiveness from in-group identification and collective guilt in adolescent and adult affiliates of a Northern Irish cross-community organization. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(2), 155-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000055
Leyens, J., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A. ve Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
Lickel, B., Schmader, T. ve Barquissau, M. (2004). The evocation of moral emotions in intergroup contexts. In N. R. Branscombe, ve B. Doosje ( Eds.) Collective guilt: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M. ve Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 145-157.
Manzi, J. ve Gonzalez, R. (2007). Forgiveness and reperation in Chile: The role of cognitive and emotional intergroup antecedents. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 71-91.
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J. ve Bliuc, A. M. (2005). Group based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659-680.
Miron, A. M., Branssombe, N. R. ve Biernat, M. R. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768-779. doi:10.1177/0146167210370031.
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N.R. ve Schmitt, M.T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 163-180.
Morton, T. A. ve Postmes, T. (2011). Moral duty or moral defence? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of ingroup perpetrated harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 127-134. doi:10.1002/ejsp.751
Myers, E., Hewstone, M. ve Cairns, E. (2009). Impact of conflict on mental health in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of intergroup forgiveness and collective guilt. Political Psychology, 30, 269-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00691
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461- 476.
Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R. ve Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508–521.
Roccas, S., Klar, Y. ve Liviatan, I. (2004). Exonerating cognitions, group identification, and personal values as predictors of collective guilt among Jewish-Israiles. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 130-147) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C. ve Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-221.
Rotella, K. N. ve Richeson, J. A. (2013a). Body of guilt: Using embodied cognition to mitigate backlash to reminders of personal & ingroup wrongdoing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 643-650.
Rotella, K. N. ve Richeson, J. A. (2013b). Motivated to”Forget”: The effects of in- group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 730-737.
Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Molina, R. E., Branscombe, N. R. ve Sullivan, D. (2013). Displacing blame over the ingroup’s harming of a disadvantaged group can fuel moral outrage at a third-party scapegoat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 898-906.
Schimel, J., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Waxmonsky, J. ve Arndt, J. (1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 905-926.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. ve Brehm, J. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men’s collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe ve B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75-94) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., Branscombe, N. R. ve Brehm, J. W. (2008). The difficulty of making reparations affects the intensity of collective guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 267–279. doi:10.1177/1368430208090642
Shepherd, L., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A. S. (2013). The self-regulatory role of anticipated group-based shame and guilt in inhibiting in-group favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 493-504.
Shnabel, N., Halabi, S. ve Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867-877.
Sibley, C. G., Robertson, A. ve Kirkwood, S. (2005). Pakeha attitudes toward the symbolic and resource-specific aspects of bicultural policy in New Zealand: The legitimizing role of collective guilt for historical injustices. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 171–181.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R. ve Rothschild, Z. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778-795.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., Rothschild, Z. K. ve Cronin, T. J. (2013). Self-harm focus leads to greater collective guilt: The case of the U.S.-Iraq conflict. Political Psychology, xx, xx. doi: 10.1111/pops.12010.
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L. ve Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
Tarrant, M., Branscombe, N., R., Warner, R. H. ve Weston, D. (2012). Social identity and perception of torture: It’s moral when we do it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 513-518. doi: 10:1016/j.jesp.2011.10.017.
Wohl, M. J. A. ve Branscombe, N. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303.
Wohl, M. J. A. ve Branscombe, N. R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 988-1006.
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R. ve Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1-37.
Wohl, M. J. A., Matheson, K., Branscombe, N. R. ve Anisman, H. (2013). Victim and perpetrator groups’ responses to the Canadian Government’s apology for the head tax on Chinese immigrants and the moderatinng influence of collective guilt. Political Psychology, 34(5), 713-726.
van Leeuwen, E., van Dijk, W. ve Kaynak, Ü. (2013). Of saints or sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Process and Intergroup Relations. 1-16, doi: 10.1177/1368430213485995

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
Telif Hakkı (c) 2016 Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi
